Search Results for "Competition Act 2002"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "Competition Act 2002"

132 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 132 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Competition Commission of India's Jurisdiction in Bid Rigging Case Involving State Lottery Tenders. The Court affirmed the Commission's authority to investigate allegations of cartelisation and bid rigging under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002, while holding that the State's regulatory actions under the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 do not constitute abuse of dominant position under Section 4.

19 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from a complaint filed with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) by a private company, alleging anti-competitive practices...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

9 Sep 2020

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on rate analysis and rejection of counterclaims under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Apr 2015

The Union of India, through the Executive Engineer, CPWD, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in CPWD Contract Dispute — Insistence on Specific Brand Violated Competition Act. Court sets aside award that upheld termination for refusal to use Johnson vitrified tiles, holding that insistence on a single brand without allowing equivalent amounted to abuse of dominant position under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

6 Jun 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment of a Single Judge dismissing the appell...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds OBC Reservation in All-India Quota Medical Seats — Constitutionality of Reservation for Backward Classes in State-Surrendered Seats Affirmed. Court holds that reservation in AIQ seats is permissible and does not violate the principle of merit, and that the executive can introduce reservation in AIQ seats without legislation.

20 Jan 2022

This judgment pertains to a batch of writ petitions challenging the reservation for Other Backward Classes (OBC) and Economically Weaker Section (EWS)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Port Trust Resolution Requiring Use of Port-Provided Labour. The resolution dated 25th June 2002 requiring stevedoring licensees to use labour provided by the Port Trust is valid under Section 42 of the Major Port Trusts Act, 1963, and does not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

11 Jan 2012

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging a resolution dated 25th June 2002 and a subsequent communication d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Income Tax Dispute Over Non-Compete Fee Taxability. Amount Received Under Deed of Covenant Held as Capital Receipt Not Taxable Under Section 28(ii)(a) of Income Tax Act, 1961, Due to Separate Genuine Transaction and Procedural Error in High Court's Judgment.

22 Jul 2020

The appeal concerned the assessment year 1995-96 involving Shri Shiv Raj Gupta, Chairman and Managing Director of Central Distillery and Breweries Ltd...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Uber's Appeal Against CCI Investigation Order for Alleged Abuse of Dominant Position Through Predatory Pricing. The Court held that information showing Uber incurred a loss of Rs.204 per trip was sufficient to form a prima facie case under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

3 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed two civil appeals filed by Uber India Systems Pvt. Ltd. against orders of the Competition Commission of India (CCI) and th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Pre-Qualification Criteria in Mining Tender for Being Arbitrary and Unreasonable. Condition requiring prior experience in coal washery operation within a specified region held to be discriminatory and violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

9 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Bhatia Coal Washeries Ltd., challenged the pre-qualification criteria of Tender No. MSMC/MINING/2019/07 dated 16-8-2019 issued by the ...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)