Search Results for "Competition Act, 2002"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Competition Act, 2002"

173 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 173 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeals by Competition Commission of India and Kapoor Glass in Abuse of Dominance Case — No Abuse Found in Volume Discounts and Contractual Terms by Dominant Glass Tubing Manufacturer. The court held that volume discounts are not per se abusive under Section 4 of the Competition Act, 2002, and that the evidence did not establish anti-competitive foreclosure or refusal to supply.

30 Jun 2025

The case arises from an information filed by Kapoor Glass India Pvt. Ltd. on 25 May 2010 under Section 19 of the Competition Act, 2002, alleging that ...

Supreme Court

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

5 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows AERA's Appeal Against TDSAT Orders Under Section 31 of AERA Act — Tariff Determination Held to Be Regulatory, Not Adjudicatory, Function. Regulatory Authority Can Challenge Appellate Tribunal's Decisions on Questions of Law.

17 Oct 2024

The Supreme Court of India addressed a preliminary objection regarding the maintainability of appeals filed by the Airports Economic Regulatory Author...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Competition Commission of India's Jurisdiction in Bid Rigging Case Involving State Lottery Tenders. The Court affirmed the Commission's authority to investigate allegations of cartelisation and bid rigging under Section 3 of the Competition Act, 2002, while holding that the State's regulatory actions under the Lotteries (Regulation) Act, 1998 do not constitute abuse of dominant position under Section 4.

19 Jan 2022

The dispute originated from a complaint filed with the Competition Commission of India (CCI) by a private company, alleging anti-competitive practices...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses NIA Appeal Against Acquittal in IED Explosion Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Conspiracy Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court upheld the acquittal of six accused under the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 and Explosive Substances Act, 1908, finding no perversity in the trial court's appreciation of evidence.

19 Sep 2020

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) appealed against the judgment and order dated 31st December 2013 of the learned Special Court for NIA cases in...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against NCLAT Order in Competition Law Case — Locus Standi of Informant Under Section 19(1)(a) of Competition Act, 2002. The Court held that the expression 'any person' in Section 19(1)(a) is wide and does not require the informant to be a consumer or competitor.

9 Sep 2020

The appeal arose from an information filed by Samir Agrawal, an independent law practitioner, before the Competition Commission of India (CCI) on 13.0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Arbitral Award in CPWD Contract Dispute — Insistence on Specific Brand Violated Competition Act. Court sets aside award that upheld termination for refusal to use Johnson vitrified tiles, holding that insistence on a single brand without allowing equivalent amounted to abuse of dominant position under Sections 3 and 4 of the Competition Act, 2002.

6 Jun 2016

The case involves an appeal under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, against a judgment of a Single Judge dismissing the appell...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Construction Contract Dispute. Court upholds arbitrator's findings on rate analysis and rejection of counterclaims under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

20 Apr 2015

The Union of India, through the Executive Engineer, CPWD, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Competition Commission Order Against Film Chamber for Lack of Jurisdiction — Unincorporated Association Not an 'Enterprise' Under Competition Act, 2002. The court held that the Competition Commission of India cannot entertain a complaint against an unincorporated association as it does not meet the definition of 'enterprise' under Section 2(h) of the Competition Act, 2002.

20 Nov 2014

The Karnataka Film Chamber of Commerce, an unincorporated association, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 18.10.2012 passed by the Compe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Disqualification from Tender for Violation of Non-Compete Clause. Clause 8.31 of Licence Agreement Between GTI and JNPT Prohibited Promoters from Bidding for Competing Projects, and Subsequent Government Policy Could Not Be Read into Existing Contract.

10 Mar 2010

The petitioner, APM Terminals B.V., a Dutch company, along with Container Corporation of India Ltd (CONCOR), formed a joint venture company called Gat...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)