Search Results for "Coercive Recovery"

170 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 170 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Resolving Legal Ambiguities and Clarifying Recovery Mechanisms Navigating the Intersection of Statutes of Limitation and Debt Recovery in India

Recovery of Time-Barred Debts under the Haryana Public Moneys (Recovery of Dues) Act, 1979: Appeals arising from judgments of the High Court of Punja...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes CBEC Circular on Service Tax Refund for Exporters — Circular Held Ultra Vires Section 11B of Central Excise Act, 1944 and Section 93 of Finance Act, 1994.

The Bombay High Court, in a batch of writ petitions filed by various companies including Larsen & Toubro Limited, Uhde India Private Limited, Tata Tel...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restrains Recovery of Excise Duty from Sick Industrial Company Without BIFR Consent. The court held that Section 22(1) of SICA bars coercive recovery of dues without prior consent of BIFR, protecting the petitioner-company's assets.

The petitioner, Polymermann (ASIA) P. Ltd., is an industrial unit engaged in the manufacture of polymer chemicals, with its factory at MIDC, Ambad, Na...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Stay Application in Arbitration Matter — Consent Order Not Stayed as No Prima Facie Case Made Out. Court held that a consent order passed under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot be stayed unless fraud or lack of jurisdiction is shown.

The petitioner, Tata Capital Financial Services Limited, a non-banking finance company, had sanctioned an invoice discounting facility of Rs. 20,00,00...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Bank's Revision in SARFAESI Act Suit — Civil Court Jurisdiction Not Barred. Suit for Declaration and Injunction Regarding Personal Guarantee Held Maintainable as It Does Not Relate to Enforcement of Security Interest Under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act.

The case involves a civil revision application filed by Allahabad Bank against an order of the Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nagpur, rejecting t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Arrest Warrant in Maintenance Case — Failure to Consider Objections and Lack of Proper Service Render Order Unsustainable. Family Court directed to reconsider husband's objections in proceedings under Section 125 CrPC after ensuring proper service of notice.

The petitioner, Sri Sailesh Kumar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengalur...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Sale Notice by Cooperative Bank — Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 Available. Cooperative Bank is a 'Bank' Under Section 2(c) of SARFAESI Act, 2002, and Can Initiate Proceedings Under the Act.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Sri N Ravindranath Kamath and another petitioner challenging the sale notice dated 19.01.2021 iss...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Injunction Restraining Bank from Enforcing Corporate Guarantee. The court set aside the injunction as the guarantee deed was unconditional and the bank had a prima facie case under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 of CPC, enabling it to proceed under SARFAESI Act and IBC.

The appeal arose from an order dated 25.07.2024 passed by the LXXXV Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bengaluru (Commercial Court) in I.A. No....