Search Results for "Cinematograph Rules"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "Cinematograph Rules"

42 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 42 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against Dismissal of Petition Challenging Portrayal of Persons with Disabilities in Film 'Aankh Micholi' — Remands to High Court for Merits Hearing. The Court held that the High Court erred in dismissing the writ petition on maintainability grounds without considering the substantial questions regarding the rights of persons with disabilities under the RPwD Act and the Cinematograph Act.

8 Jul 2024

The appellant, Nipun Malhotra, is the founder of an organization promoting disability awareness and is a person with arthrogryposis. He filed a writ p...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Copyright Injunction Against Music Streaming Service in Interpretation of Section 31D of Copyright Act, 1957. The court held that a statutory license under Section 31D for radio broadcasting does not extend to internet streaming services like Wynk Music.

20 Oct 2022

The case involves two appeals by Wynk Ltd and Bharti Airtel Ltd (defendants) against an order of the Bombay High Court (SJ Kathawalla J) dated 23rd Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction to Plaintiff in Copyright Dispute Over Film 'Sheela' — Prima Facie Finding of Valid Assignment Chain. Court holds that registered assignments under Section 48 of the Copyright Act, 1957 prevail over unregistered subsequent assignments.

21 Apr 2021

The dispute concerns the copyright in the 1987 Hindi motion picture 'Sheela', originally produced by BS Dwarakish. Goldmines Telefilms Pvt Ltd filed a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Interim Application for Injunction in Copyright Dispute Over Documentary Film 'Sindhustan' — Plaintiff Fails to Establish Prima Facie Case of Co-Producer or Joint Copyright Ownership. The Court held that an oral agreement for co-production is not sufficient to claim joint ownership of copyright under the Copyright Act, 1957, and that the Plaintiff's contributions did not amount to joint authorship.

11 Feb 2021

The suit was filed by Kabir Singh Chowdhry (Plaintiff) against Sapna Moti Bhavnani (Defendant No. 1) and others, seeking a declaration that the Plaint...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Hears Commercial Appeals Against Ad-Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement Suit Over Film Song; Directs Strict Compliance of Registration Procedures by Original Side Registry

28 Aug 2017

The appeal arose from an ad-interim injunction granted in favour of the plaintiff in a copyright infringement suit concerning the song 'Kah Doon Tumhe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Restraint on Movie 'Khairlanji Chya Mathyawar' — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against Exhibition of Film Based on True Events. The court held that the petitioners failed to establish a prima facie case for injunction as the movie was based on widely reported true events and the petitioner no.2 had not objected to the portrayal earlier.

21 Feb 2014

The petitioners, Akhil Bhartiya Dhamma Sena (a social organization) and Bhaiyyalal Bhotmange, filed a writ petition seeking restraint orders against r...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Implementation of Performing Animals Rules in Films and Advertisements. Court Holds That Mandatory Registration Under Performing Animals (Registration) Rules, 2001 Must Be Complied With Before Depicting Animals in Cinematograph Films.

22 Aug 2005

The Bombay High Court, in a public interest litigation filed by People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA) and another, considered the grievance t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses State Government's Appeal in Cinema Licence Dispute Under Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) Act, 1952. The Licensing Authority Has Exclusive Power to Decide Licence Applications in the First Instance, and the State Government's Control Under Section 5(2) Cannot Be Exercised to Directly Adjudicate Applications.

9 Dec 1965

The dispute arose from an application by Hari Krishan Sharma for a licence to construct a permanent cinema hall under the Punjab Cinemas (Regulation) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Vires of Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021 Amidst Concerns Over Judicial Independence. Petitioners Argue That Provisions on Appointment, Tenure, and Removal of Tribunal Members Undermine the Constitutional Balance of Power.

1 Jan 1970

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions challenging the vires of the Tribunals Reforms Act, 2021. The petitioners, led by the Madras Bar Assoc...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)