Search Results for "CBDT Circular"

100 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 100 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Condonation of Delay in Filing Income Tax Return for Refund Claim. CBDT's Rejection of Condonation Application Set Aside as Reasons for Delay Were Genuine and Not Habitual.

The petitioner, Artist Tree Pvt. Ltd., engaged in dealing in artifacts and finances, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 1997-1998 on 14 Sept...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Deduction Case for Pharmaceutical Freebies. Expenses on Gifting Freebies to Medical Practitioners Are Deductible Under Section 37(1) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as Indian Medical Council Regulations Only Prohibit Acceptance, Not Gifting, Under Explanation 1.

The dispute involved a pharmaceutical company, referred to as Apex, appealing against a High Court judgment that upheld orders disallowing part of its...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging CBDT Circular Denying Adjustment of TDS Against Tax Payable Under Voluntary Disclosure Scheme. Circular No. 755 dated 25-07-1997 Held Ultra Vires as It Imposed Restriction Not Found in Finance Act, 1997 or Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Earnest Business Services Pvt. Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, and its director, filed a writ petition und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revenue's Appeals in Income Tax Block Assessment Case - Upholds Addition of Unexplained Cash Credits Under Section 68 of Income Tax Act, 1961. The court held that the assessee failed to prove the genuineness of cash credits, reversing the Tribunal's order.

The Revenue filed appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, 'B' Bench, Chennai, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Classification of Plant Growth Promoters as Excisable Goods Under Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985. Products Containing NPK as Essential Constituent Classified as 'Other Fertilizers' Under Note 6 Chapter 3105, Attracting 1% Duty.

The petitioners, Dharti Agro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and its director, challenged an order dated 8 March 2017 passed by the Commissioner of Central Excise...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Promotee Appeal in Seniority Dispute with Direct Recruits in Income Tax Department — Direct Recruits Not Entitled to Seniority from Vacancy Year When Recruitment Process Not Initiated in That Year.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by promotees (appellants) against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had quashed the seniority li...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Withdrawal of Inter-Commissionerate Transfers for Inspectors Under Recruitment Rules 2016. Recruitment Rules Made Under Article 309 of the Constitution Prevail Over Executive Instructions, and ICTs Are Not Permissible as They Violate Separate Cadre Identity Under Rule 5.

The dispute arose from a batch of civil appeals filed by Inspectors of the Central Excise and Land Customs or Goods and Services Tax Administration, w...