Search Results for "CAT order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Claimant in Motor Accident Case — Functional Di...
Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in Forgery Case Due to Long Pendency and No Crim...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...

Search Results for "CAT order"

252 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 252 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tool Checkers' Merger with Retrospective Effect in Service Law Dispute. Central Administrative Tribunal's direction for prospective merger of cadres set aside, holding that merger must be effective from 25th June 1985.

16 Apr 2018

The judgment concerns four writ petitions filed by employees of the Union of India, primarily Tool Checkers, challenging the order of the Central Admi...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Promote Inspectors in Seniority Dispute Under Central Excise Recruitment Rules. Inter Se Seniority Must Be Fixed Based on 1959 and 1986 Office Memoranda with Quota Rule Compliance, Rejecting High Court's View on Vacancy Register Irrelevance.

15 Mar 2022

The dispute originated from seniority fixation among Inspectors of Central Excise, recruited through direct recruitment and promotion under the Centra...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds CAT Order in Railway Promotion Dispute — Criteria for Assessment of Candidates for PHOD Post Held Arbitrary. The Court directed review DPC for notional promotion from date juniors were promoted with consequential benefits.

19 Mar 2018

The Union of India and another (petitioners) challenged the judgment and order dated 23rd January 2001 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) in...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CAT Order Allowing Change of Date of Birth of IAS Officer. Authorities' Delay in Deciding Application for Correction of Date of Birth Cannot Be Used to Defeat Claim Under Rule 38 of Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981.

24 Jun 2016

The Union of India and the State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging the judgment and order dated 8 March 2016 passed by the Central A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Postal Department in Promotion Dispute — Merit List Division-Specific, Not Common Across Divisions. The Court held that the respondent, an Extra Departmental Delivery Agent from Banda Division, was not entitled to promotion as Postman against vacancies in Kanpur Head Post Offices because the merit list was division-specific and vacancies were to be filled from local divisions.

6 Aug 2019

The case involves a dispute over promotion to the post of Postman from Extra Departmental Delivery Agents. The appellants, the Superintendent of Post ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences in Service Matter — Retirement Age Enhancement Not Applicable to Autonomous Body Employees. The Court held that the Cabinet decision to enhance superannuation age to 65 years for AYUSH doctors was limited to those directly under the Ministry of AYUSH and CGHS, and did not extend to employees of autonomous bodies like CCRAS.

1 Jan 2023

The case involves an appeal by the Central Council for Research in Ayurvedic Sciences (CCRAS) and its Director General against the judgment of the Ori...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Challenge to CAT Order Allowing Reinstatement of Resigned IRS Officer. Resignation Withdrawn Before Acceptance, Employee Entitled to Rejoin Service Under Service Rules.

19 Jul 2018

The respondent, Sanjay Kumar S. Zumbre, was a direct recruit IRS Officer of the 1992 batch. He was transferred to Guntur Commissionerate at Vishakhapa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses BSNL's Petition Challenging CAT Direction for Expert Committee in Promotion Exam Dispute. CAT's Order to Consider Proportionate Marks for Defective Questions Does Not Amount to Revaluation and Is Within Jurisdiction.

10 Aug 2016

The petitioners, Bharat Sanchar Nigam Ltd. (BSNL), challenged the judgment and order dated 22 February 2012 of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CA...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Former JFO Seeking Promotion Parity with HPOs — Holds That Carpet Scheme and Marketing Scheme Officers Belong to Separate Cadres with Distinct Promotion Channels. The appellant, originally appointed as JFO in the Carpet Scheme and later redesignated as CTO, was not entitled to be treated as HPO or granted promotions in the HPO channel, as the two schemes constitute separate cadres.

16 Jul 2025

The appellant, Rampat Azad, was appointed as a Junior Field Officer (JFO) in the Carpet Weaving Training Centre under the All India Handicrafts Board ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court Order Quashing Chairman's Stay on Tribunal Proceedings — Chairman of Central Administrative Tribunal Cannot Stay Proceedings Pending Before a Division Bench While Sitting Singly. The Court held that the Chairman's power under Section 5(6) read with Section 25 of the Administrative Tribunals Act, 1985 does not extend to staying proceedings before a co-ordinate Bench.

1 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by All India Institute of Medical Sciences (AIIMS) against the Uttarakhand High Court's order quashing th...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)