Search Results for "CASS scrutiny"

27 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 27 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 — Internal Audit Objection Constitutes Change of Opinion. Notice Issued Beyond Three Years Based on Audit Objection Without Fresh Material Held Invalid as It Amounts to Mere Change of Opinion.

The petitioner, Shri Dilip Laximan Powar, a paralyzed individual represented by his wife, runs a hardware and paint retail business as a proprietorshi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Section 143(2) Notice Issued Beyond Time Limit in Income Tax Reassessment — Notice Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period Under Section 149 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Is Invalid.

The petitioner, AMNS Khopoli Limited (formerly Uttam Galva Steels Limited), challenged a notice dated 31st May 2023 issued by the Assistant Commission...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Notice Issued Beyond Four Years Based on Mere Change of Opinion on Already Scrutinized Transactions is Invalid.

The petitioner, Sterlite Technologies Limited, challenged a notice dated 27 March 2021 issued under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for reasse...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment based on mere change of opinion on share premium addition under Section 68 is invalid as all material was disclosed during original assessment.

The petitioner, Rajshree Realtors Private Limited, a real estate company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2012-2013 declaring income of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Full and True Disclosure — Share Premium Valuation Dispute Not a Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, The Suminter Organic and Fair Trade Cotton Ginning Mill Pvt. Ltd., challenged a notice under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice in Income Tax Case Due to Change of Opinion. Notice under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for reassessment of derivative transaction loss set aside as Assessing Officer had already examined the issue during original assessment.

The petitioner, Shrikant Phulchand Bhakkad (HUF), through its Karta, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment Notice Quashed as Based on Mere Change of Opinion Where Original Assessment Under Section 143(3) Had Examined Section 54 Exemption Claim.

The petitioner, Gagan Omprakash Navani, an individual assessed to tax, filed a return of income for Assessment Year 2016-2017 on 10 April 2017, declar...