Search Results for "Bombay Stamps Act"

163 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 163 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Advocate's Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Court Fee Stamps. Section 52B of Bombay Stamps Act, 1958 Held Inapplicable to Court Fee Stamps Under Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959.

The petitioner, a practicing advocate, filed a civil suit for possession valued at Rs. 40,500 and paid court fee of Rs. 4,530 using stamps. The court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty Paid Under Mistake of Law — Petitioner Entitled to Refund of Rs. 3,00,100/- for Electronic Stamps Purchased Under Wrong Scheme Code. Mistake of Law Does Not Bar Refund When Stamps Not Used and No Unjust Enrichment.

The petitioner, Manjeet Singh, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court seeking a refund of stamp duty paid under a mistake of law. The peti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Police Officer in MCOCA Case for Lack of Sanction and Prima Facie Evidence of Organised Crime. The court held that the absence of valid sanction under Section 23(2) of MCOCA and failure to establish a prima facie case of organised crime entitled the applicant to bail.

The applicant, Anil Murlidhar Deshmukh, a police officer, was arrested on 8th October 2004 in connection with a case registered under various sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Recall Document for Evidence in Civil Suit — Inherent Power Under Section 151 CPC Can Be Invoked for Recall of Document from Collector's Office for Purpose of Tendering in Evidence

The petitioner, Shri Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., a housing society, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31-1-2012 passed by the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand on Unexecuted Lease Agreement — No Liability Under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Adjudication under Section 31 cannot be basis for demand when document is not executed and no stamp duty is chargeable.

The petitioner, Crisil Limited, a company registered under the Companies Act, had been in occupation of office premises at Hiranandani Business Park, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Stamp Duty Demand Against Successors in Interest Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Predecessor in title not given opportunity of hearing before determination of deficit stamp duty under Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958.

The petitioners, who are the legal heirs and successors in interest of one Abubakar Memon, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution...