Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Recall Document for Evidence in Civil Suit — Inherent Power Under Section 151 CPC Can Be Invoked for Recall of Document from Collector's Office for Purpose of Tendering in Evidence

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 3
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shri Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd., a housing society, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 31-1-2012 passed by the 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, in Special Civil Suit No.979 of 2006. The trial court had rejected the petitioner's application under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) for calling back a document, namely an agreement of development and sale dated 27-3-2002, from the office of the Collector of Stamps, Nagpur, for the purpose of tendering it in evidence. The petitioner was the plaintiff in the suit. The respondents are the defendants. The High Court, after hearing both sides, held that the inherent power under Section 151 CPC can be invoked for such a purpose. The court noted that the trial court had rejected the application without considering the scope of Section 151 CPC. The High Court set aside the impugned order and allowed the application, directing the trial court to recall the document from the Collector of Stamps for the purpose of tendering it in evidence. The writ petition was allowed with no order as to costs.

Headnote

A) Civil Procedure - Inherent Powers - Section 151 Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 - Recall of Document - The plaintiff filed an application under Section 151 CPC to recall a document (agreement of development and sale) from the Collector of Stamps for tendering in evidence. The trial court rejected the application. The High Court held that the inherent power under Section 151 CPC can be invoked for such purpose, and the trial court's order was set aside. (Paras 2-4)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the trial court was justified in rejecting the application under Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff for calling back the document (agreement of development and sale) from the office of the Collector of Stamps for the purpose of tendering it in evidence.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the writ petition, set aside the order dated 31-1-2012, and allowed the application under Section 151 CPC. The trial court was directed to recall the document from the Collector of Stamps for the purpose of tendering it in evidence. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Section 151 CPC
  • inherent powers of court
  • recall of document
  • agreement of development and sale
  • evidence
  • civil procedure
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2012 LawText (BOM) (05) 55

Writ Petition No.803 of 2012

2012-05-07

R.K. Deshpande, J.

Shri V.N. Kedar for Petitioner, Shri S.P. Bhandarkar for Respondents

Shri Gruha Nirman Sahakari Sanstha Ltd.

Smt. Chandrakala w/o Late Chakradhar Dhage & Ors.

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition challenging rejection of application under Section 151 CPC for recall of document.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought to call back the agreement of development and sale from the Collector of Stamps for tendering in evidence.

Filing Reason

The trial court rejected the application under Section 151 CPC filed by the plaintiff for recall of document.

Previous Decisions

The trial court rejected the application at Exhibit 139 in Special Civil Suit No.979 of 2006.

Issues

Whether the trial court was justified in rejecting the application under Section 151 CPC for recall of document.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that the inherent power under Section 151 CPC can be invoked for recall of document. Respondents opposed the application.

Ratio Decidendi

The inherent power under Section 151 CPC can be invoked for the purpose of recalling a document from the office of the Collector of Stamps for tendering it in evidence.

Judgment Excerpts

The challenge in this petition is to the order dated 31-1-2012 passed below application Exhibit 139 in Special Civil Suit No.979 of 2006 by the learned 2nd Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur. The inherent power under Section 151 of the Civil Procedure Code can be invoked for such purpose.

Procedural History

The petitioner filed Special Civil Suit No.979 of 2006. During the suit, the petitioner filed an application under Section 151 CPC at Exhibit 139 for calling back the agreement of development and sale from the Collector of Stamps. The trial court rejected the application on 31-1-2012. The petitioner then filed the present writ petition challenging that order.

Acts & Sections

  • Code of Civil Procedure, 1908: 151
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Quashes Notification Extending Administrator's Term for Municipal Council — Election Must Be Held Within Three Months. Failure to Conduct Elections Within Stipulated Period Violates Section 47 of Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Na...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner to Recall Document for Evidence in Civil Suit — Inherent Power Under Section 151 CPC Can Be Invoked for Recall of Document from Collector's Office for Purpose of Tendering in Evidence