Search Results for "Bogus Capital Gain"

36 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 36 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Capital Gains Liability of Firm on Partner's Retirement. Full Bench resolves conflict under Section 45(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding liability when retiring partner receives only money for his share without distribution of assets.

The case involves an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from an order dated 02.03.2006 in ITA No.1295/BANG/2004 for the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Independent Application of Mind by AO. Dividend Stripping Provision Under Section 94(7) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Not Applicable Where Assessee Suffered Net Loss on Sale of Mutual Fund Units Exceeding Dividend Received.

The petitioner, Karan Maheshwari, an individual investor in shares, stocks, securities, and mutual funds, challenged a show cause notice dated 20 Augu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in Income Tax Case. ITSC's order under Section 245D(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld as valid and not perverse.

The Commissioner of Income Tax, Central – II, Mumbai, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 31st July 2013 passed by the Income Tax Settl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition for Condonation of Delay in Investment Under Section 54EC of Income Tax Act, 1961 — CBDT's Rejection Set Aside. The CBDT's power under Section 119(2)(b) is not circumscribed by any time limit and must be exercised liberally to avoid hardship.

The petitioner, Dr. Sujatha Ramesh, sold an immovable property during the Assessment Year 2013-14 and realized long-term capital gains. To claim exemp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escaping Assessment. Reopening Beyond Four Years Without Fresh Material Constitutes Change of Opinion on Same Set of Facts.

The petitioner, Gateway Leasing Pvt. Ltd., a non-banking financial company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, filed a writ petition under Artic...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitioner in Income Tax Reassessment Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material and No Failure to Disclose. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as Revenue Failed to Allege Non-Disclosure Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Sun Tan Trading Co. Ltd., is engaged in the business of import and distribution of alcoholic beverages in India. It had entered into a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice and Assessment Order in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Fresh Material. Reassessment under Section 147/148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 invalid as based on same material already considered in original assessment under Section 143(3).

The petitioner, Pushpa Nahata, challenged a notice under section 148 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 dated 30 March 2022 and an assessment order dated 22 ...