Search Results for "BEST Bus"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Attachment of Property in NSEL Scam C...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Customs Classification Dispute — Bulk Pet F...

Search Results for "BEST Bus"

282 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 282 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Directs BMTC to Resume Audio Announcement System in Buses for Persons with Disabilities — Right to Accessibility Under Rights of Persons with Disabilities Act, 2016 Upheld. Court holds that audio announcements are essential for visually impaired and other disabled persons to access public transport, and their discontinuance violates statutory rights.

15 Nov 2024

The present public interest petition was filed by N Shreyas, a visually impaired individual, and Shreyas Global Trust for Social Cause, seeking a writ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness and Contradictory Evidence. Conviction under Sections 279, 304(A) and 337 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove rash and negligent driving beyond reasonable doubt.

14 Nov 2024

The case arises from a criminal revision application filed by Shivaji Santu Zanzad, a driver of a PMT bus, challenging his conviction under Sections 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Bus Driver in Rash Driving Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Negligence. Conviction under Sections 279 and 304-A IPC set aside as sole eyewitness did not testify that the bus was driven rashly or negligently.

21 Oct 2024

The applicant, Shivaji Damodar Karne, a bus driver employed with BEST, was convicted by the trial court (28th Esplanade Court, Mumbai) in CC No.40/P/9...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partly Allows Appeal by Transport Corporation Reducing Compensation in Fatal Accident Case. Multiplier reduced from 13 to 7 for deceased aged 74, upholding 50% contributory negligence.

17 Dec 2020

The case arises from a motor accident on 13.04.2012 when a bus owned by M/s. Kadamba Transport Corporation Ltd. (appellant) and driven by respondent n...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Compensation Award in Motor Accident Case — BEST Bus Driver's Negligence Proved. Tribunal's finding of involvement of bus and negligence upheld; compensation reduced from Rs.11,88,000 to Rs.10,38,000 with 7.5% interest.

17 Oct 2019

The appeal was filed by the Mumbai Municipal Corporation (BEST Undertaking) challenging the judgment and award dated 17.7.2015 passed by the Claims Tr...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Dismisses Appeal by MSRTC in Motor Accident Claim Case — Compensation Award Upheld as Just and Proper. Claimant's Income Assessed at Rs. 3,000 per month and Future Prospects Added at 40% Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

11 Oct 2019

The present appeal was filed by the Divisional Controller, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenging the judgment and award da...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Compensation in Motor Accident Claim — Bus Driver's Negligence Established by Preponderance of Probabilities. Non-examination of Pillion Rider Not Fatal to Claim Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

14 Feb 2019

The case arises from a motor accident on 28 October 2011, when Sitaram, a senior government school teacher, was riding a motorcycle with a pillion rid...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Under Section 163-A of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Negligence Not Required for Structured Compensation. Court holds that for claims under Section 163-A, the claimant need not prove negligence; the 'arising out of use' requirement is satisfied if the vehicle was involved in the accident, even if the collision was not the direct cause of death.

27 Jun 2017

The case arises from a motor accident claim filed by the parents and sister of Dinesh Kadam, a 22-year-old lift mechanic who died on 11 April 2007 aft...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Reinstatement of Bus Driver in Gross Negligence Case. The Industrial Court's finding that the bus driver was not negligent was based on evidence and not perverse, and thus no interference under Article 227 was warranted.

11 Jul 2014

The petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay (BEST Undertaking), challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, dated 16 August 2007,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Dismissal of Bus Driver for Gross Negligence Causing Fatal Accident. Disciplinary Enquiry Valid Despite Acquittal in Criminal Case as Standard of Proof Differs.

24 Jul 2006

The Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) through its BEST Undertaking challenged a Labour Court order that set aside the dismissal of a bus driver...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)