Search Results for "BANDH"

55 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 55 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Land Dispute Case — Life Imprisonment Maintained for Three Accused. Common Intention Under Section 34 IPC Established as All Accused Participated in Assault on Deceased Step-Brother.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Vaijapur, convicting three appellants for the murder of Baburao Dhanad, who was th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Land Encroachment Suit — Remands for Fresh Consideration of Measurement Evidence. Court holds that the lower appellate court failed to consider the TILR's map and report, which constituted a substantial question of law under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal arises from a suit for possession of encroached land. The appellants, original plaintiffs, are members of a joint family own...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Land Dispute Case Due to Civil Nature and Malafide Prosecution — Criminal proceedings under Sections 442, 323, 504, 506, 427 IPC quashed as the dispute was essentially civil and the FIR was filed with malafide intent to harass the applicants.

The applicants, Raghunath Udelal Mahale and three others, filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Sentence for Murder in Land Dispute Case. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing father over boundary dispute confirmed based on credible eyewitness testimony and medical evidence.

The appellant, Umesh Bharat Gaikwad, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhoom, District Osmanabad for the murder of Kashinath Gaikwad und...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case - Claimants Awarded Higher Market Value and Separate Compensation for Structures and Trees. Market Value Determined at Rs. 1500 per R for Jirayat Land Based on Sale Instances Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The appellants, original claimants, owned land in village Kuslumb, Taluka Patoda, District Beed, which was acquired by the State of Maharashtra for co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Property Dispute Over Injunction Orders — Held That First Appellate Court Erred in Granting Injunction Without Considering Balance of Convenience and Prima Facie Case Under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC.

The case involves two appeals filed by the appellants against the judgment and order of the First Appellate Court in Regular Civil Appeal Nos. 615/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Dispute Over BANDH and Trees — Plaintiff Fails to Prove Exclusive Title. Concurrent findings of fact upheld that disputed BANDH and trees are jointly owned by both parties based on Commissioner's map and evidence.

The case involves a dispute between the appellant (original plaintiff) and the respondent (original defendant) over a BANDH (embankment) and trees sit...