Search Results for "Article 311(2)(b)"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Challenge to Deemed Conveyance in Favor ...
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Act Case — Upholds Appointment ...
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Under Section 302 I...
High Court of Bombay Quashes Deputy Registrar's Directives in Co-operative Socie...

Search Results for "Article 311(2)(b)"

4 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Setting Aside of Dismissal of Judicial Officers for Non-Recording of Reasons Under Article 311(2)(b). Liberty to Initiate Fresh Proceedings with Proper Reasons Upheld as Valid.

8 Nov 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals by three judicial officers—Hari Niwas Gupta, Komal Ram, and Jitendra Nath Singh—who were dismissed from s...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Dismissal of Police Constable for Invalid Invocation of Article 311(2)(b) — General Apprehension of Witness Intimidation Insufficient to Dispense with Departmental Enquiry. The court held that the exception under Article 311(2)(b) of the Constitution of India must be based on specific material and cannot be invoked merely because the delinquent is a member of the police force.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Mr. Prajyot Ramchandra Kandolkar, a police constable in Goa, was dismissed from service by an order dated 5.8.2015 passed by the Super...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal Order in Service Matter — Delay Not Condoned Despite Acquittal in Criminal Case. Tribunal's refusal to condone delay upheld as Petitioner failed to show sufficient cause for delay of over 7 years in challenging dismissal order under Article 311(2)(b) of Constitution.

14 Jun 2010

The Petitioner, Shri Premchand Balaram Pardeshi, was appointed as Guard – Class III in April 1980. He was placed under suspension on 25.11.1992 due ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Dismissal of Assistant Police Inspector Without Departmental Enquiry Under Article 311(2)(b) — Upholds MAT Orders. The Court held that the Commissioner of Police's order dispensing with enquiry was valid and the Tribunal's refusal to condone delay and review was justified.

10 Mar 2010

The petitioner, Shri Shantilal Dnyanu Jadhav, was an Assistant Police Inspector in the Government of Maharashtra. By an order dated 3 September 2005, ...

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)