Search Results for "Article 110"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Article 110"

2194 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2194 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Conditions for Provisional Release of Seized Goods Under Customs Act. Court holds that pre-deposit of differential duty and interest as condition for provisional release under Section 110A is not warranted and modifies conditions to require only bank guarantee and bond.

25 Jul 2011

The petitioners, Apollo Cranes Pvt. Ltd. and another, imported nine cranes between 17 November 2005 and 6 April 2010, which were assessed and bills of...

High Court

Bombay High Court Orders Return of Seized Goods Under Section 110(2) of Customs Act, 1962 Due to Failure to Issue Show Cause Notice Within One Year. The court held that seizure becomes illegal if no notice under Section 124(a) is issued within one year, and extension orders passed after expiry of one year are invalid.

3 Oct 2023

The petitioner, M/s. AM Prototyping Labs Pvt. Ltd., imported a Flashforge WaxJet 400 3D Prototyping Machine along with accessories, valued at Rs.26,44...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice Under Section 110(g) CrPC for Lack of Habitual Offender Allegation. Single Incident Insufficient to Invoke Preventive Provision Requiring Bond for Good Behaviour.

16 Feb 2005

The petitioner, Mujibur Rehman Abdul Ganikhan, challenged a show cause notice issued under Section 110(g) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrP...

High Court

KAHC010159832015_1

15 Dec 2017

...

High Court

Gujarat High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Collector's Suo Motu Revision Under Section 110 of Tenancy Act. Suo Motu Revision Power Under Section 110 of Gujarat Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 Is Not Subject to Limitation and Can Be Exercised to Correct Illegal Mutation Entries Made in Violation of Section 43.

17 Mar 2026

The petitioner, Morarji Ratnshi Tatariya Suthar, filed two writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Validity of Customs Circular Mandating BIS Certification for Alloy Steel Deformed Bars. The Circular is Challenged as Ultra Vires the Bureau of Indian Standards Act, 1986 and Violative of Fundamental Rights.

24 Dec 2014

The four writ petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of India were filed by importers of alloy steel deformed bars/reinforcement bars challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Provisional Attachment Orders Under Section 110 of Customs Act, 1962 — Lack of Reasonable Belief and Non-Compliance with Procedural Safeguards. Attachment orders set aside as customs authorities failed to demonstrate reasonable belief that goods were liable to confiscation and did not follow mandatory procedure under Section 110(3) requiring notice within six months.

13 Mar 2024

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed by Chokshi Arvind Jewellers and Pallav Gold, challenging provisional attachment orders passed by t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Unilateral Appointment of Arbitrators Violates Equality Principle Under Section 18 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Party Autonomy Cannot Override Mandatory Requirement of Independence and Impartiality, and Unilateral Appointment Clauses in Public-Private Contracts Are Unconscionable and Void.

13 Nov 2024

The Supreme Court of India, in a Constitution Bench judgment, addressed the validity of unilateral appointment of arbitrators under the Arbitration an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Notice Under Section 110(e) and (g) CrPC Against Corporator for Lack of Material and Abuse of Process. Court holds that preventive action requires credible material showing habitual offending, not isolated incident.

9 Nov 2017

The petitioner, Shirish Hiralal Choudhary, a Corporator from Nandurbar, filed a criminal writ petition under Articles 14, 21, and 226 of the Constitut...

High Court

WRIT PETITION NO.2031 OF 2018

9 Jun 2021

This writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay challenging the constitution...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)