Search Results for "Apartment Buyers Agreement"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Apartment Buyers Agreement"

43 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 43 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals of Flat Buyers Against Developer for Delayed Possession, Holds Unilateral Compensation Clause Unfair. Developer's stipulation of Rs 5 per sq ft per month as liquidated damages for delay held inadequate and unconscionable; flat buyers entitled to compensation at 6% per annum on amounts paid.

24 Aug 2020

The case involves appeals by 171 flat buyers against the dismissal of their consumer complaint by the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Lavasa Corporation's Second Appeals Against RERA Orders, Holding That RERA Has No Jurisdiction Over Complaints Filed Before Its Establishment. The Court ruled that the Real Estate Regulatory Authority cannot entertain complaints regarding agreements executed prior to the commencement of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

7 Aug 2018

The judgment involves three second appeals filed by Lavasa Corporation Limited against orders of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority (RERA) and the A...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Orders Forensic Audit and Status Quo in Real Estate Project Dispute Over Fund Siphoning Allegations. The Court Approved Forensic Audit Findings That the Amrapali Group Controlled the La-Residentia Project and Diverted Buyer Funds, Leading to Interim Relief for Apartment Buyers Under Writ Petition (Civil) No. 940 of 2017.

29 Jun 2022

The Supreme Court of India, in a civil original jurisdiction matter, addressed a dispute concerning the Amrapali La-Residentia real estate project. Th...

Tribunals

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal Allows Appeals by Homebuyers Associations Against NCLT Order Rejecting Impleadment in CIRP — Allottees Held to Be Financial Creditors Under IBC Entitled to Be Heard. The Tribunal directed impleadment of the associations in the pending application before the Adjudicating Authority to ensure their right to be heard is protected.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves four appeals filed by two residents' associations (Sharon Hills Residents Association and Angelwoods Apartments Allottees Associatio...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in Real Estate Regulation Case, Upholding Authority's Jurisdiction and Pre-deposit Condition. The court affirmed that a single member of the Real Estate Regulatory Authority has jurisdiction to order refunds under Section 18 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and the pre-deposit requirement under Section 43(5) is valid for statutory appeals.

11 Nov 2021

The dispute arose from appeals filed by promoters and real estate developers against orders of the High Court of Allahabad, which had dismissed their ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Ban on Apartmentalisation in Chandigarh Residential Plots to Preserve City's Original Character. Fragmentation of single dwelling units into multiple apartments violates Rule 16 of Chandigarh Estate Rules, 2007 and the Chandigarh Master Plan 2031.

10 Jan 2023

The case involves a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Chandigarh Citizens Forum (appellants) against the Chandigarh Administration and others, s...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in MRTP Act Case Upholding Commission's Finding of No Unfair Trade Practices. The Court Held That Extra Charges and Cancellation of Apartment Allotment Were Contractual and Did Not Constitute Unfair Trade Practices Under Sections 36-A and 36-B of the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Act, 1969.

25 Jan 2022

The appeal arose from a judgment dated 19.01.2009 by the Monopolies and Restrictive Trade Practices Commission, New Delhi, which dismissed a complaint...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Developer's Appeal in Consumer Dispute Over Delayed Possession and Refund. The court upheld the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission's order for refund with interest, rejecting the developer's argument that possession delivery period should start from Fire NOC date under the Apartment Buyers Agreement, as construction had commenced earlier.

21 Jan 2022

The appeals arose under Section 23 of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 from the decision of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission on co...

Tribunals

NCLAT Allows Appeals by Commercial Space Buyers in CIRP of IP Constructions Pvt. Ltd. — Resolution Plan Must Include Allottees' Claims. The Tribunal held that commercial space allottees are 'financial creditors' under Section 5(8)(f) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, and their claims must be considered in the resolution plan.

30 Nov -0001

The judgment arises from three appeals filed by commercial space allottees against orders of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), Principal Bench...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)