Search Results for "Allottee withdrawal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "Allottee withdrawal"

72 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 72 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Whether Withdrawal of Land Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Permissible After Possession Had Already Been Taken. Dispute Centered on Notification Dated 12.04.2001 Withdrawing Acquisition of Survey No.50 Despite Prior Possession and Multiple Dismissals of Challenges by Land Owners.

1 Aug 2026

Judgment Analysis - Auto Generated...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Examines Validity of Notification Withdrawing Land from Acquisition Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894 After Possession Taken. Issue Concerns Whether Withdrawal Is Permissible When Acquisition Proceedings Had Attained Finality and Possession Was Taken Years Earlier.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute concerned the validity of a notification under Section 48 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 withdrawing Survey No. 50 (6 acres 20 guntas) ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tamil Nadu Housing Board's Appeal, Upholds Cancellation of Commercial Plot Allotment and Directs Eviction of Allottee for Chronic Default. Court Holds Board Not Bound by Clerical Error in Computing Dues and Emphasizes Public Interest in Management of Public Property Under Tamil Nadu Housing Board Regulations.

26 Jul 2026

The dispute arose from an auction held in 1986 by the Tamil Nadu Housing Board for a prime commercial plot in Chennai. The respondent, S. Ganesan, eme...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against High Court's Restoration of Land Acquisition Withdrawal Notification Under Section 48 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894. The appeals raise the issue whether the State Government could validly withdraw from acquisition after possession had been taken, and whether the writ petition by land owners was barred by res judicata.

1 Aug 2026

The dispute pertains to the acquisition of land for the formation of BTM Layout by the Bangalore Development Authority (BDA). In 1977, the State of Ka...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes MHADA Cancellation of Flat Allotment for Non-Payment Due to Non-Issuance of Demand Letter. Petitioner's Allotment Cannot Be Cancelled Without Issuance of Formal Demand Letter Under Regulation 18(1) of MHADA (Disposal of Land) Regulations, 1992.

12 Oct 2023

The petitioner, Sandeep Uttam Bodke, applied for allotment of a flat under the Lower Income Group (LIG) category in response to an advertisement issue...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Promoter's Appeal in RERA Case, Holding That Acceptance of Delayed Possession Without Protest Does Not Waive Right to Interest Under Section 18 of RERA. Statutory Right to Interest Under RERA Cannot Be Waived by Mere Acceptance of Possession Without a Clear Agreement.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against an order of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate Tribu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Builder's Appeals in Consumer Cases, Sets Aside Refund Order. Clause 11.4 of Builder-Buyer Agreement Limits Developer's Liability to Refund Only if Agreement is Terminated; Allottees Not Entitled to Refund Without Termination.

1 Jan 2020

The appeals arise from a common judgment of the National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) in ten consumer cases filed by allottees again...

High Court

Bombay High Court Admits Second Appeal in RERA Refund Case on Substantial Questions of Law Regarding Consent for Extension of Possession Date and Application of Section 62 of Indian Contract Act. The appeal challenges the Appellate Tribunal's order upholding refund under Section 18 RERA, raising issues of novation of contract and consent of allottees.

2 May 2022

The present appeal is filed under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) by Jayesh Tanna, Director of ITMC Develo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Holds That Mere Filing of No-Instructions Pursis Without Court Order Permitting Advocate Withdrawal Under Civil Manual Clause 660(4) Is Insufficient Compliance. Court finds that trial court failed to record satisfaction regarding absence of inconvenience to client or court, thus violating mandatory procedure under Clause 660(4).

13 Apr 2018

The dispute involved a cooperative society's suit for declaration and possession of a plot against the appellant and the original allottee. The societ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Appeal in RERA Delayed Possession Case, Upholds Allottees' Right to Interest. Section 18 of RERA Overrides Section 55 of Contract Act; Acceptance of Delayed Possession Does Not Waive Right to Compensation.

18 Jun 2026

The case involves a Second Appeal filed by CCI Projects Private Limited (the promoter) against the judgment of the Maharashtra Real Estate Appellate T...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)