Search Results for "Air Crash"

18 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 18 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Air Crash Compensation Case — Enhances Damages for Bungalow Destruction. Compensation for property damage must be based on cost of reconstruction and actual loss, not market value, under tort law principles.

The appellants, Thota Sayyed and his wife Shamshad Sayyed, owned a newly constructed residential bungalow in Goa. An air crash occurred, causing the c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Aircraft Crash Damage Due to Alternative Remedy of Suit. Petitioners' claim for Rs. 75 lakhs for destruction of bungalow by naval aircraft crash rejected as writ court not appropriate forum for disputed facts.

The petitioners, owners of plots in Dabolim village, Goa, constructed a bungalow on the land. On 1st October 2002, a naval aircraft belonging to the r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"High Court Upholds Employees Compensation in Mangalore Air Crash Case" "Significant ruling on compensation, foreign exchange rate application, and principal employer liability under EC Act."

The Bombay High Court affirmed the compensation awarded under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 (EC Act). The Court dealt with significant issues, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Manufacturer's Appeal in Airbag Non-Deployment Case. Non-Disclosure of Airbag Deployment Threshold Constitutes Unfair Trade Practice Under Consumer Protection Act, 1986.

The appeal arose from a consumer complaint filed by Shailendra Bhatnagar against Hyundai Motor India Limited regarding non-deployment of airbags in hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Public Prosecutor for Pune District Due to Non-Compliance with Section 24 CrPC. Appointment made without consulting the Advocate General and without considering eligible Additional Public Prosecutors violates statutory requirements.

The petitioner, Mrs. Neelima Sadanand Vartak, an Additional Public Prosecutor in Pune District since 1986, challenged the notification dated 1st June ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Withdrawal of Suit by Legal Representatives in Property Dispute — Held That Executors of Deceased Plaintiff's Will Are Necessary Parties and Suit Cannot Be Withdrawn Without Their Consent

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by H.H. Jyotiraditya Madhavrao Scindia and Smt. Madhavi Raje Madhavrao Scindia, who are legal representativ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Rulings Clarify

The appeals concerning the definition of "commercial purpose" under the Consumer Protection Act, 1986 (now 2019). The key issue is whether a company's...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds International Arbitral Award in Coal Supply Dispute — Damages Awarded for Breach of Contract. Division Bench of Delhi High Court Erred in Setting Aside Majority Award Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 as Findings Were Plausible and Not Perverse.

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal against a Division Bench judgment of the Delhi High Court that had set aside a majority international arbit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Revokes Leave for Representative Suit in Tata Group Shareholder Dispute. Court holds that shareholders of different listed companies lack the same interest required under Order 1 Rule 8 CPC.

The Plaintiffs, claiming to be shareholders of various listed companies of the Tata Group, filed a representative suit under Order 1 Rule 8 of the Cod...