Search Results for "Additional District Government Pleader"

1679 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1679 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Hears Writ Petition Challenging Rescission of Appointment of Additional District Government Pleader Within 24 Hours. The Court Examines Whether the Impugned Notification Violates Constitutional Prohibition Against Arbitrariness in Context of Pleasure Doctrine.

The case concerns the abrupt withdrawal of an appointment as Additional District Government Pleader at the newly established XI Additional District an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Public Interest Litigation to Protect Land for Government Sports Complex at Navi Mumbai. CIDCO's commercial allotment of land earmarked for sports complex quashed; State Government's decision to shift complex to remote location set aside.

The Bombay High Court was hearing a Public Interest Litigation filed by the Indian Institute of Architects, Navi Mumbai Center, challenging the action...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Quarry Lease Applications under Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rules. Petitioners sought processing of pre-2016 amendment applications under unamended rules as per Rule 8-B.

Multiple writ petitions were filed before the Karnataka High Court challenging endorsements issued by the Department of Mines and Geology rejecting ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC010068412019_1

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Reduction of Term of District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor. Amendment reducing term from three years to one year held valid; no vested right to continue for full term.

The petitioner, Vikas Baburao Patil Shirgaonkar, was appointed as District Government Pleader and Public Prosecutor at Satara on 6th August 2014 for a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Refers Questions on Eligibility of Judicial Officers for Direct Recruitment as District Judges to Constitution Bench — Interpretation of Article 233(2) of Constitution of India, 1950 Regarding Requirement of Continuous Practice as Advocate.

The Supreme Court, in a reference by a three-Judge Bench, examined substantial questions of law concerning the interpretation of Article 233(2) of the...