Search Results for "Aarey Colony"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Concurrent Findi...
High Court of Bombay at Bombay Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Acc...
Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Ac...
High Court of Karnataka Allows EPF Organisation's Writ Petition for Priority Pay...

Search Results for "Aarey Colony"

19 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 19 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Aarey Colony Development as Forest Land — Held That Aarey Colony Is Not a Forest Under the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, and That the State Government Has Discretion to Use Land for Public Purposes. The court ruled that the dictionary meaning of 'forest' does not apply to Aarey Colony, and the petitioners failed to establish that it is a forest requiring prior approval under Section 2 of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980.

4 Oct 2019

The petitioners, Vanashakti (a public trust) and four individuals, filed a Public Interest Litigation under Article 226 of the Constitution of India b...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Closure of Byculla Zoo for Failing to Meet Modern Standards of Animal Welfare and Conservation. Zoo's antiquated conditions violate fundamental duty of compassion under Article 51-A(g) of the Constitution and provisions of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act, 1960 and the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.

18 Jul 2005

The Bombay High Court delivered an oral judgment on July 18, 2005, in a public interest litigation filed by People for Ethical Treatment of Animals (P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Tree Authority Resolution for Metro Tree Felling Due to Lack of Quorum and Non-Compliance with Maharashtra (Urban Areas) Protection and Preservation of Trees Act, 1975. The resolution approving felling of 2646 trees was invalid as the Tree Authority meeting lacked quorum and illegally delegated powers to the Tree Officer.

4 Oct 2019

The Bombay High Court disposed of two writ petitions challenging a resolution dated 29th August 2019 passed by the Tree Authority, Mumbai, which appro...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

6 Dec 2012

The appellant, Babuji Chandrarao Yedla, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay in Sessions Case No.460 of 2002 for the murder ...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Order on Tree Felling for Mumbai Metro Line-3 Car Shed at Aarey Colony. MMRCL's Application for Permission to Fell 177 Trees Exceeds Earlier Court Order Permitting Only 84 Trees.

17 Apr 2023

The Supreme Court was hearing a clarification application filed by Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) regarding its order dated 29 November...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses "Crimeophobia" PIL as Frivolous: Critiques Misuse of Judicial Time. Public Interest Litigation filed by a self-styled criminologist sought wide-ranging and unrelated reliefs, including the establishment of an Anti-Organized Crime Unit and other diverse demands.

19 Aug 2024

The Bombay High Court dismissed a PIL filed by "Crimeophobia," a criminology firm led by Mr. Snehil Dhall, citing it as an example of frivolous litiga...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Corruption Case: Demand Without Acceptance Does Not Constitute Offence Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The court held that for offences under Sections 7, 8, and 13(2) of the PC Act, both demand and acceptance are essential; mere demand without acceptance is not an offence.

13 Mar 2018

The applicants, Rajendra Shinde and Sanjay Bramhankar, were public servants working as Chief Manager (Engineering) and Manager (Engineering) respectiv...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Abatement Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Settlement Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Renders Proceedings Infructuous and Extinguishes Liability.

30 Sep 2024

The appellant, M/s Patanjali Foods Limited (formerly Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd), filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ch...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition for Lack of Jurisdiction in Cotton Contract Dispute. Exclusive Jurisdiction Clause in Favor of Indore Courts Prevails Over Arbitral Seat at Mumbai.

20 Jul 2016

The petitioner, M/s. Nomula Brothers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Section 34 Petition in Arbitration Matter — Upholds Arbitral Award for Unpaid Invoices. Findings of Fact by Arbitrator on Delivery of Goods Are Final and Not Open to Reappreciation Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

12 Jul 2016

The appellant, Royal Palms (India) Private Limited, was a company engaged in a development project at Marol Maroshi, Borivali, Mumbai. The respondent,...

1 2

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)