Supreme Court Clarifies Order on Tree Felling for Mumbai Metro Line-3 Car Shed at Aarey Colony. MMRCL's Application for Permission to Fell 177 Trees Exceeds Earlier Court Order Permitting Only 84 Trees.

  • 118
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The Supreme Court was hearing a clarification application filed by Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL) regarding its order dated 29 November 2022. By that order, the Court had modified an earlier status quo order and permitted MMRCL to move the Tree Authority for felling 84 trees for the Metro Car Shed Land at Aarey Colony admeasuring approximately 33 hectares for Mumbai Metro Line-3. Subsequently, MMRCL initially moved an application on 19 December 2022 for permission to fell 84 trees, but on 2 January 2023 sought permission to cut 185 trees without moving the Court. The Deputy Superintendent of Gardens, after a joint inspection on 19 December 2022, sought compliance on certain aspects including a fresh survey and numbering of trees. On 12 January 2023, the Superintendent of Gardens issued a public notice indicating that 185 trees would be affected, of which 124 would be felled and 53 transplanted. Since the proposed action exceeded the 84 trees permitted by the Supreme Court, a public interest litigation was filed before the Bombay High Court. The Division Bench, by order dated 9 March 2023, observed that the petitioner had already raised objections before the Tree Authority and that it was for the Tree Authority to consider whether trees beyond 84 were shrubs or otherwise. On 15 March 2023, the Superintendent of Gardens and Tree Officer granted permission for felling 124 trees and transplanting 53 trees. MMRCL then sought clarification from the Supreme Court to implement this permission. The Court noted that the permission granted by the Tree Officer was for 177 trees (124 felling and 53 transplanting), which was in excess of the 84 trees permitted by its earlier order. The Court directed that the matter be listed for further hearing.

Headnote

A) Environmental Law - Tree Felling - Permission for Felling Trees - Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888, Tree Authority Rules - MMRCL sought clarification to implement permission granted by Tree Officer for felling 124 trees and transplanting 53 trees, exceeding the 84 trees permitted by Supreme Court order dated 29 November 2022 - Court held that the Tree Authority must consider whether trees beyond 84 are shrubs or otherwise, and MMRCL must comply with the earlier order - (Paras 1-6)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether MMRCL can fell 177 trees (124 felling and 53 transplanting) for the Metro Car Shed at Aarey Colony when the Supreme Court's order dated 29 November 2022 permitted only 84 trees to be felled.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The Court directed that the matter be listed for further hearing. No final order was passed on the clarification application.

Law Points

  • Tree felling permission
  • Public interest litigation
  • Status quo order
  • Compliance with court order
  • Tree Authority jurisdiction
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2023 LawText (SC) (4) 126

IA No 68608 of 2023 in Suo Moto Writ (Civil) No 2 of 2019

2023-04-17

Dr Dhananjaya Y Chandrachud, CJI

Mumbai Metro Rail Corporation Limited (MMRCL)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Clarification application by MMRCL regarding tree felling permission for Metro Car Shed at Aarey Colony.

Remedy Sought

MMRCL sought clarification to implement permission granted by Tree Officer for felling 124 trees and transplanting 53 trees.

Filing Reason

The permission granted by Tree Officer exceeded the 84 trees permitted by Supreme Court order dated 29 November 2022.

Previous Decisions

Supreme Court order dated 29 November 2022 modified status quo and permitted MMRCL to move Tree Authority for felling 84 trees. Bombay High Court order dated 9 March 2023 observed that Tree Authority should consider whether trees beyond 84 are shrubs.

Issues

Whether MMRCL can fell 177 trees when Supreme Court order permitted only 84 trees? Whether Tree Authority's permission for 177 trees is valid in light of Supreme Court order?

Submissions/Arguments

MMRCL submitted that 177 trees have to be felled or transplanted for the Metro Car Shed Land at Aarey Colony. MMRCL sought permission to implement the permission granted on 15 March 2023 by the Superintendent of Gardens for felling 124 trees and transplanting 53 trees.

Ratio Decidendi

The Tree Authority must consider whether trees beyond the 84 permitted by the Supreme Court are shrubs or otherwise, and MMRCL must comply with the earlier order of the Court.

Judgment Excerpts

By the order of this Court dated 29 November 2022, an earlier order directing the preservation of the status quo on felling trees was modified, so as to permit MMRCL to move the Tree Authority on its application for felling 84 trees. Since the action proposed was in excess of the 84 trees which were permitted to be felled by the order of this Court, a public interest litigation was moved before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay.

Procedural History

Supreme Court order dated 29 November 2022 modified status quo and permitted MMRCL to move Tree Authority for felling 84 trees. MMRCL moved application on 19 December 2022 for 84 trees, but on 2 January 2023 sought permission for 185 trees without moving Court. Public notice issued on 12 January 2023 for 185 trees. PIL filed in Bombay High Court; High Court order dated 9 March 2023. Tree Officer granted permission on 15 March 2023 for 124 felling and 53 transplanting. MMRCL filed clarification application in Supreme Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act, 1888:
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
Supreme Court Supreme Court Clarifies Order on Tree Felling for Mumbai Metro Line-3 Car Shed at Aarey Colony. MMRCL's Application for Permission to Fell 177 Trees Exceeds Earlier Court Order Permitting Only 84 Trees.
Related Judgement
High Court Gujarat High Court Dismisses Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — License Not Proven Fake. Insurance Company Failed to Produce Cogent Evidence to Establish Driving License Was Fake, Hence Not Exonerated from Liability.