Search Results for "2009 amendment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "2009 amendment"

4013 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4013 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Victim's Revision Against Dismissal of Appeal in Sexual Harassment Case — Right of Victim to Appeal Acquittal Under Section 372 Cr.P.C. Recognized. The High Court held that the proviso to Section 372 Cr.P.C. confers a right on the victim to appeal against an order of acquittal passed by a Judicial Magistrate First Class before the Sessions Court, and the Sessions Judge erred in dismissing the appeal as not maintainable.

23 Apr 2019

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by Ku. Ragini d/o Rajesh Chourasia, the victim of offences punishable under Sections 354A, 354...

High Court

Bombay High Court Examines First Informant's Right to Orally Oppose Discharge Application Under Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 and Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. Statutory Scheme Limits Victim's Advocate to Assisting Prosecution Under Section 24(8) CrPC and Section 18(8) BNSS, and Private Pleader Cannot Address Oral Arguments Under Section 301 CrPC/Section 338 BNSS.

14 Jul 2025

The petition arose from a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Magistrate dated 22 January 2025 granting au...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement in Commercial Suit, Rejecting Limitation Bar Under Article 137. Article 137 of Limitation Act, 1963 Held Inapplicable to Applications for Amendment of Pleadings, Allowing Defendants to Elaborate Existing Defences.

7 Dec 2011

The case involves a Chamber Summons taken out by defendant nos. 1, 2, 4, and 5 in Suit No. 2256 of 1998 pending before the Bombay High Court. The defe...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Writ Petition Challenging Amendment in Civil Suit — Amendment Sought After Trial Commenced Held Barred by Order VI Rule 17 CPC. The court set aside the trial court's order allowing amendment as the plaintiff failed to show due diligence as required under the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

20 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Kailas Shivling Jagtap, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 4th March 2011 passed by the Civil Judge, Junior Division, K...

High Court

Bombay High Court Reviews Challenge to Trial Court's Rejection of Amendment Application in Partition Suit. The dispute centered on compliance with the proviso to Order VI Rule 17 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, after the trial court refused to permit post-trial amendment to add a legal heir and seek declaration that a will and sale deed were null and void.

8 Sep 2025

The litigation arose from a partition suit filed by the original plaintiff in 2011 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Nanded, seeking partition a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Suit for Specific Performance After Trial Commenced — Amendment Sought After Cross-Examination of Plaintiff's Witness Held Not Barred by Proviso to Order VI Rule 17 CPC as Trial Had Not Concluded and Amendment Was Necessary for Determining Real Controversy

25 Sep 2013

The petitioner, Walchandnagar Industries Limited, the original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 28-11-2012 passed by the learned Civil Judge,...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Written Statement and Counter Claim in Suit Filed Before 2002 CPC Amendment. Order 6 Rule 17 as amended by 2002 Amendment Act does not apply to suits instituted before 1.7.2002.

29 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sumita Pradipkumar Dixit, challenged an order dated 29.8.2009 passed by the trial court in RC Suit No. 187/1999, which rejected her ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment in Specific Performance Suit. Amendment to incorporate subsequent events and additional reliefs was held permissible under Order VI Rule 17 CPC as it did not change the nature of the suit.

6 Jan 2012

The petitioner, original defendant No.5 in a suit for specific performance of agreements dated 19/4/1992 and 20/11/1992 concerning lands bearing Surve...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Amendment of Plaint in Partition Suit Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC — Rejection of Amendment on Grounds of Delay and Change of Nature of Suit Set Aside. The court held that amendments should be liberally allowed to determine the real controversy, and delay alone is not a ground for rejection unless it causes irreparable prejudice.

17 Apr 2018

The petitioner, defendant No.1 in the original suit, challenged the order dated 15.07.2013 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge, Mangalore, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Property Dispute Due to Subsequent Dispossession. Amendment Based on Events After Issues Framed Is Permissible Under Order 6 Rule 17 CPC Despite Delay.

7 Feb 2012

The petitioner, Dela Gurudal Vanjari, filed a suit in 2005 seeking a declaration that a mutation entry was illegal and for an injunction against the r...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)