Search Results for "1984 Amendment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "1984 Amendment"

1456 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1456 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Partially Strikes Down FCRA Amendment Act 2020 — Ban on Transfer of Foreign Funds and Mandatory Aadhaar Held Unconstitutional. The court upheld the requirement of a single FCRA account at SBI New Delhi as a reasonable regulatory measure to prevent misuse of foreign funds.

1 Jan 2021

The judgment deals with a batch of writ petitions challenging the constitutional validity of certain amendments made to the Foreign Contribution (Regu...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds FCRA Amendments in Challenge by NGOs — Restrictions on Foreign Contribution Transfers and Mandatory Account in SBI New Delhi Held Reasonable. Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Sections 7, 12(1A), 12A, and 17(1) of Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Amendment Act, 2020 as Not Violative of Articles 14, 19, and 21.

8 Apr 2022

The judgment concerns the constitutional validity of amendments to the Foreign Contribution (Regulation) Act, 2010 (FCRA) introduced by the Foreign Co...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Amendment Order in Cheque Dishonour Case — Amendment After Cognizance and Process Not Permissible. Allowing amendment to introduce new facts after cognizance and issuance of process would cause prejudice to accused and is not allowed under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

28 Apr 2023

The case involves a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging an order dated 20.04.2013 passed by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment in Cheque Dishonour Complaint Under Section 138 NI Act — Amendment Sought to Correct Date of Cheque Presentation Does Not Change Nature of Complaint. The court upheld the Magistrate's order allowing amendment to correct typographical error in date of cheque presentation, holding that no prejudice was caused to the accused.

28 Apr 2023

The case involves a criminal application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging an order dated 20.04.2013 passed by th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Maharashtra Private Security Guards (Amendment) Act, 1996. Petitioner Trade Unions Contend Amendment is Retrograde and Repugnant to Central Act, Requiring Presidential Assent.

10 Oct 2006

The Bombay High Court, in its Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, heard three writ petitions filed by trade unions namely Karantikari Suraksha Rakshak Sangh...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Government Order Rejecting Correction of Date of Birth, Directs Recording of Correct Date. Limitation Plea Rejected as Petitioner Proved Correct Date with Documentary Evidence and Applied Promptly After Discovering Error in Service Book.

22 Apr 2016

The petitioner joined government service as a lecturer through MPSC in 1984. His service book, initially held by the Accountant General, was transferr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Amendment of Complaint in Cheque Dishonour Case Under Section 138 NI Act. Revisional Court's Order Allowing Amendment to Add Partnership Firm as Accused Upheld as No Prejudice Caused.

28 Apr 2023

The case arises from a criminal writ petition filed by the petitioners (original accused and the partnership firm) challenging the judgment and order ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Pension Benefits to Employees of Sheltered Workshop for Handicapped - Government Resolution of 1984 Extended to Workshop Employees

5 Mar 2014

The petitioners, employees of the Sheltered Workshop Section of Home for Aged and Handicapped, sought a writ of mandamus directing the respondents to ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 24(6-A) CrPC Allowing Appointment of Private Advocates as Public Prosecutors in High Court — Provision Not Arbitrary or Discriminatory Against Government Prosecutors. The court held that the amendment does not violate Articles 14, 16, or 21 of the Constitution and that the State has the discretion to appoint any advocate for conducting cases in the High Court.

25 Jul 2017

The petitioners, the Maharashtra State Public Prosecutors Association and several individual Assistant/Additional Public Prosecutors working in the co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Union of India in Section 17A Challenge — Prior Approval Requirement for Investigating Public Servants is Constitutionally Valid. Read Down to Mandate Independent Screening; Lokpal to Approve for Covered Public Servants.

1 Jan 1970

The writ petition was filed by the Centre for Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of Section 17A of the Prevention of C...

1 2 3

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)