Search Results for "1925"

658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Civil Revision Application Arising from Order in CMA. The matter involved an application under an unspecified provision and challenges an interlocutory order passed in the trial court.

The limited available text indicates that the Bombay High Court heard a Civil Revision Application No. 728 of 2023 filed by Shaikh Mohammad Azahar Moh...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds State Legislation on Gurdwara Management Under Entry 32 of List II. Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 Found Constitutionally Valid as It Pertains to Management of Religious Institutions Within State Legislative Competence.

The dispute arose from the enactment of the Haryana Sikh Gurdwara (Management) Act, 2014 by the State of Haryana, which created a separate juristic en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of Section 28A(1) of Maharashtra Civil Courts Act, 1869 in Probate Reference. Section 28A(1) is not inconsistent with Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Civil Judges can be invested with probate jurisdiction.

This judgment arises from a reference under Section 113 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, made by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Repugnancy Between Section 28A of Bombay Civil Courts Act, 1869 and Section 299 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Petitioner Contends That District Court Lacked Jurisdiction to Hear Appeal from Probate Revocation.

The writ petition was filed by Smt. Nola Jonathan Ranbhise before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, challenging the constitutional validity of S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Appeals Under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act Against Orders of Civil Judge, Senior Division Lie to District Court, Not High Court. The Court interpreted Section 384 strictly, limiting High Court's appellate jurisdiction to orders of District Judges only.

The Bombay High Court considered two appeals challenging orders passed by Civil Judges, Senior Division on applications under Section 372 of the India...