Search Results for "section 376"

1842 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1842 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Consent and Age Discrepancy Cast Doubt on Prosecution Case, Leading to Acquittal Under Section 376 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act.

The appellant, Mahesh Bhimraj Jadhav, was convicted by the Designated Court under the POCSO Act for the rape of a 17-year-old girl. The prosecution al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Petition to Cancel Bail in Rape Case — No Supervening Circumstances or Misuse of Bail Found. The court held that cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) CrPC requires supervening circumstances or misuse of liberty, not mere disagreement with the bail order.

The State of Karnataka, through Alur Police, filed a petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking cancellation...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Appeal Against Denial of Anticipatory Bail in SC/ST Act Case; Considers Applicability of Section 18A Bar. Court Notes That Prima Facie Offences Under Sections 3(1)(r) and 3(1)(s) Require Caste-Based Abuse in Public View, Which Appeared Lacking.

The case involved a criminal appeal under the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989 and the Indian Penal Code, st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petition to Cancel Bail in Cheating Case — No Misuse of Bail or Violation of Conditions Established. Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. requires strong grounds for cancellation; mere disagreement with trial court's reasoning insufficient.

The petitioner, Smt. Lalitha, filed a criminal petition under Section 439(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) before the High Court o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act and Rape Case Due to Consensual Relationship and Lack of Prima Facie Case. Court finds that the victim's conduct and delay in FIR indicate a consensual relationship, not an offence under Section 376 IPC or Sections 3(1)(w)(i), 3(2)(v) of the SC/ST Act.

The appellant, Hitesh Santosh Vartak, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14(A) of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atrociti...