Search Results for "notice under section 148"

1873 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1873 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Karnataka Administrative Tribunal Order in Transport Department Recruitment Dispute. The Petitions Seek to Quash the Tribunal's Order on Grounds of Illegality.

This batch of writ petitions arose from proceedings before the Karnataka Administrative Tribunal (KAT). The petitioners, numerous individuals, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Termination of Developer Appointment in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Petitioner's failure to obtain 70% slum dweller consent and submit documents within stipulated time justified termination under Section 13(2) of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act, 1971.

The petitioner, Surjit Singh Arora, sole proprietor of M/s. Sukhamani Construction, was appointed as developer for a slum rehabilitation scheme under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Tribunal's Order Upheld for Lack of Substantial Question of Law. Penalty under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for alleged concealment of income was deleted by the Tribunal on finding no deliberate concealment.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Accused in Second FIR Case Due to Impermissibility of Multiple FIRs for Same Incident. Second FIR for Offences Under Sections 504, 332, 353 IPC Arising from Same Occurrence of Unauthorised Buntings Removal Held Inadmissible, Following T.T. Antony Principle.

The case arose from a criminal petition filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an FIR registered at Hosakot...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reopening Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Fresh Material. Reimbursement of Expenses Disclosed in Return and Application Under Section 195(2) Sought, No Failure to Disclose Material Facts.

The petitioner, Monitor India Pvt. Ltd., a subsidiary of a Dutch company, challenged a notice dated 22 March 2011 issued under Section 148 of the Inco...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices for Lack of Reasonable Belief of Income Escapement — Section 148 Income Tax Act, 1961. Reopening of assessments based on mere change of opinion without tangible material is invalid.

The petitioner, Amar Hotchand Nagpal, a finance and estate broker, challenged three notices dated 23rd September 1997 issued under Section 148 of the ...