Search Results for "Supreme Court discretionary power"

1816 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1816 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case — Acquittal Upheld Due to Unreliable Trap Evidence and Invalid Sanction. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378(1)(3) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 against the judgment and order of acquittal dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reopen Evidence After Plaintiff's Side Closed. Court Held That Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Evidence or to Remedy Negligence of Party.

The petitioner, Sri P. Ramaprasad, was the plaintiff in O.S. No. 231/2019 pending before the XIX Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement of Sale Not Proved as Genuine and Enforceable. Plaintiff Failed to Establish Readiness and Willingness to Perform Contract Under Section 16(c) of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The appeal arises from a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 12.04.2005. The plaintiff (respondent No.1) claimed that defendan...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deferment of Cross-Examination in Sessions Case for Lack of Reasons Under Section 231(2) CrPC. Court holds that discretion to defer cross-examination must be exercised with reasons and not arbitrarily.

The petitioner, Pradip Kundlikrao Kute, challenged an order dated 01.04.2022 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Basmathnagar in Sessions Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Petition Challenging Draft Development Plan Publication and Extension Under Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Allege Irregularities in Municipal Corporation's Substitution of Plan and Ex Post Facto Extension Under Section 26.

The matter pertains to a writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Aurangabad Bench, challenging the notification dated 04.02.2016 published under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal Against High Court Order Summoning Additional Evidence in Asaram Bapu Conviction Case. Section 391 CrPC Cannot Be Used to Fill Gaps in Prosecution Case or to Introduce Evidence That Could Have Been Produced at Trial.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Rajasthan against the judgment of the Rajasthan High Court dated 10.02.2022. The High Court...