Search Results for "Procedural illegality"

1038 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1038 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers Whether Retrospective Absorption Order Requires Review of Earlier Promotional Exercises for Superintendents (Legal/Drafting). Legal Principle Examined: Whether Regular Service for Promotion Can Be Counted Retrospectively When Government Recognises Prior Cadre Status.

The writ petition was filed by two Legal Assistants working in the Law Department of the Government of Goa, who sought a review of the departmental pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petition Seeking Compensation for Illegal Handcuffing and Parading in a Bailable Offence. The Court Deliberates on Police Conduct and Fundamental Rights Under Article 21 in Context of Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioner, a law student, faced five criminal complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, arising from dishonoured cheq...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Frames Charges Against Accused for Filing Frivolous Litigations; Supreme Court Dispenses with Trial in Contempt Case. Forum Shopping and Abuse of Process Held to Amount to Criminal Contempt Under Section 2(c) of Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.

The criminal contempt petition was filed by Hasham Investment and Trading Company Private Limited, Wipro Limited, and Azim Hasham Premji (complainants...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

KAHC030058022017_1

A batch of writ petitions was filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by workmen of the Karnataka State Road Transport Corporati...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Second Appeal in Suit for Declaration and Injunction Involving Allegation of Fraudulent Sale by Forged Power of Attorney. The Appeal Challenges Reversal of Trial Court's Decree by First Appellate Court.

Background: This matter arises from a Regular Second Appeal filed by the plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Sets Aside High Court Order Permitting Recall and Reopening of Evidence in Civil Suit Due to Impermissible Filling of Lacunae. Recalling Witness Under Order XVIII Rule 17 CPC Cannot Be Used to Adduce Additional Evidence After Deletion of Rule 17A, Especially When Prior Admissions Exist.

The dispute arose from a civil suit filed in 2010 seeking declaration of ownership and permanent injunction over certain properties. The appellant, de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Passes Order in Writ Petition by Company Challenging Rejection of Application Under Industrial Park Scheme, 2002. Petitioner's Application Dated 15.12.2006 Under IPS 2002 Was Rejected on Ground That Scheme Expired on 31.03.2006.

The petitioner, a private limited company, proposed to set up an industrial park named 'Salarpuria Touch Stone' in Bangalore under a Joint Development...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Division Bench Hears Revenue’s Appeals Against Single Judge’s Order Quashing Section 153C Notices; Weighs Maintainability of Writ Petitions and Natural Justice Concerns.

The present judgment arises from a batch of writ appeals filed by the Revenue against a common order dated 12.08.2022 passed by a Single Judge of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Cross Arbitration Petitions Challenging Copyright Royalty Award. License Fee and Infringement Claims Under Copyright Act, 1957 and Section 34 of Arbitration Act Evaluated.

The Indian Performing Right Society Ltd. (IPRS), a copyright society registered under Section 33 of the Copyright Act, 1957, and Entertainment Network...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Hears Challenge to Deputy Director's Approval of Teacher Appointments in Private School. Petition Alleges Non-Compliance with Section 5, Rule 9 of MEPS Act and Government Resolution Dated 06.02.2012.

The writ petition challenged the order of Deputy Director of Education confirming the approval of appointments of two Shikshan Sevak teachers in a sch...