Search Results for "Judicial Compliance"

4648 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 4648 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Adjudication Orders for Breach of Natural Justice. Non-Compliance with Tribunal's Remand Directions on Disclosure of Test Reports Amounts to Denial of Fair Hearing Under Article 226 of the Constitution.

The writ petition under Article 226 arose from a dispute over the classification of a product known as 'CHOCOS' manufactured by Kellogg India Private ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows De-Sealing of Commercial Premises in PIL Based on Judicial Committee Order. Applicant's Premises Ordered to be De-Sealed Subject to Compliance with Common Order Dated 18.12.2023.

The present application (I.A. No.203615 of 2024) was filed by an individual applicant seeking de-sealing of his commercial premises located at plot No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PILs Challenging Appointment of Vice Chancellor of University of Mumbai. Court upholds appointment process under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994, finding no illegality or mala fides.

The judgment pertains to two Public Interest Litigations (PILs) and a Writ Petition challenging the appointment of Dr. Rajan Welukar as the Vice Chanc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appellant in SEBI PFUTP Regulations Case Due to Non-Disclosure of Investigation Report. The Court Held That the Investigation Report Under Regulation 9 Must Be Disclosed to Ensure a Fair Hearing Under Principles of Natural Justice, as It Forms the Basis for the Show Cause Notice.

The dispute arose from a show cause notice issued by SEBI to the appellant, alleging violations of the SEBI (Prohibition of Fraudulent and Unfair Trad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Debt Recovery Tribunal Has Exclusive Jurisdiction Under RDDB Act, 1993, and Arbitration Clause Cannot Oust It.

The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed by Harvestdeal Securities Ltd. challenging an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRA...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging DRAT Order Setting Aside DRT's Reference to Arbitration in Bank Recovery Suit. Arbitration Clause Does Not Oust Jurisdiction of DRT Under Section 19 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

The petitioner, Harvestdeal Securities Ltd., challenged an order of the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal (DRAT) dated 19 February 2015, which set asid...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Writ Petition of Auction Purchaser Against Bank for Delivery of Possession Under SARFAESI Act. Bank's Failure to Hand Over Vacant Possession After Sale Confirmation Constitutes Dereliction of Duty Enforceable Under Article 226.

The petitioner, Vijayanand Srinivasan, an auction purchaser, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of ma...