Search Results for "Seized Money"

1747 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1747 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder and Cruelty Case Due to Lack of Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Found Insufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302 and 498-A of Indian Penal Code, 1860.

The appellant, Bhola Harishchandra Gupta, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Bombay, for offences under Sections 498-A and 302 of the Ind...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Sri Manjunatha Kutta, was convicted by the Special Judge, Bengaluru Urban District, for offences under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony found doubtful and medical evidence contradicted prosecution timeline.

The case pertains to the murder of Dashrath Charmya Kale, allegedly committed by the appellants, Bhurya @ Gulab s/o Fajitya Kale and his wife Suman, o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against the conviction of Baliram Ghodke (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand and Acceptance of Bribe. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Yuvraj Chintaman Selokar, was a senior clerk in the Court of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Aheri. He was convicted by the Special Ju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Sanjay s/o Anna Sose, was convicted by the learned Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Buldana in Sessions Trial No.89/1998 for an offenc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Kidnapping, Murder, and Causing Disappearance of Evidence in Child Murder Case. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen Theory and Motive Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 364, 302, and 201 IPC.

The appellant, Barku Bhavrao Bhaskar, was convicted by the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nashik in Sessions Case No.49 of 2001 for offences under Sec...