Search Results for "Binding Agreement"

3959 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3959 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Arbitration Appointment Despite Limitation Bar — Scope of Section 11(6A) Confined to Existence of Arbitration Agreement. The 2015 Amendment Act restricts court's role to checking arbitration agreement existence, leaving limitation and other issues to arbitrator under Section 16.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 21.12.2010 between M/s. Uttarakhand Purv Sainik Kalyan Nigam Limited (Petitioner-Contractor) and Northern Co...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order Under MOFA Due to Lack of Notice to Developer. Section 11 of MOFA Requires Notice to All Parties Before Granting Unilateral Conveyance.

The petitioners, M/s. ACME Enterprises (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Ummedra K. Vardhan, challenged an order dated 26th November 2019 passe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Winding-Up Petition Against Sundeep Polymers Due to Bona Fide Dispute Over Hire Purchase Agreement. Dispute Regarding Defective Vehicle and Pending Consumer Complaint Constitutes Substantial Grounds, Not a Mere Debt Acknowledgment.

The petitioning-creditor, Tata Motors Ltd (formerly Tata Finance Ltd), filed a winding-up petition under sections 433 and 434 of the Companies Act, 19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Customs Duty Refund for Re-imported Goods Under Section 26(1)(b) of Customs Act, 1962 — Re-importation Within One Year of Export Qualifies for Refund Despite Procedural Lapses

The petitioner, Covestro India Private Limited, exported certain goods for exhibition purposes and subsequently re-imported them. The petitioner paid ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals by Developer in Possession Suits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Cannot Be Reopened Under Section 100 CPC. Suits for possession based on title and prior possession were decreed; no substantial question of law arose.

The appellant, M/s. Samruddhi Developers, a partnership firm, filed four second appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challe...