Search Results for "exhaustive provisions"

1816 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1816 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Quashing of FIR Alleging Extortion Racket in Electoral Bond Scheme. Former BJP State President Challenges Registration of Crime Under Sections 384, 120B, 34 IPC Based on Private Complaint.

The petitioner, a former Member of Parliament and State President of BJP, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. 224/2024 re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Dismisses Second Appeal in Motor Vehicle Tax Recovery Suit Holding Civil Court Jurisdiction Impliedly Barred. Suit Against State Authorities Barred by Order 9 Rule 9 CPC and Alternate Remedy Under Bombay Motor Vehicle Taxes Act, 1958 Precludes Civil Suit.

The second appeal arose from a suit filed by M/s Pandurang & Krishnarao Co., the owner of a truck, which was sold to defendant no.4 and subsequently t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in U.P. Gangsters Act Case — Quashes FIR for Lack of Anti-Social Activity. Property Disputes of Civil Nature Cannot Be Basis for Prosecution Under Sections 2 and 3 of the Uttar Pradesh Gangsters & Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Jay Kishan and others against the State of Uttar Pradesh and others, challenging the dismissal of their ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Consumer Complaint Against Postal Authorities in Kisan Vikas Patra Fraud Case. Postal authorities not vicariously liable for agent's fraud as payment was made to holder under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, and appellants' negligence in signing instruments contributed to loss.

The dispute arose from a consumer complaint filed by Pradeep Kumar and Raj Rani against postal authorities, including the Post Master General and othe...