Search Results for "enhancement appeal"

2668 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2668 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Reduced Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased motorcyclist found 50% contributory negligent for accident involving a lorry, reducing insurer's liability.

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 26.12.2009 involving a motorcycle ridden by the deceased and a lorry owned by respondent no.5 a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Challenging Taxability of Interest Received on Enhanced Motor Accident Compensation. Petitioner Claims Interest is Capital Receipt and Not Taxable; Revenue Relies on Sections 56(2)(viii) and 145A(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, a 48-year-old man rendered paraplegic and bedridden since a road accident at age 8, filed a writ petition challenging the taxability o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Defendant's Appeal Against Amendment of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit. High Court's Liberal Approach to Allowing Amendment for Enhancing Damages After 31 Years Upheld, with Issue of Limitation Kept Open for Trial Under Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

The Supreme Court of India adjudicated a civil appeal arising from a special leave petition, where the appellant, Life Insurance Corporation of India,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim, Sets Aside Contributory Negligence Finding. Deceased motorcyclist hit by tempo from behind; court holds tempo driver solely negligent, enhances compensation to Rs.2,58,44,336/- with 9% interest.

The appellants, legal representatives of the deceased Anil Yadav, filed a first appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Appeal Seeking Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case — Burden of Proof Not Discharged. Appellant failed to prove inadequacy of compensation under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 as evidence of comparable sales was not properly established.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by Benjamin Pereira against the judgment and award dated 17th November 2006 passed by the Learned District Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioners' Writ Petitions Seeking Revival of Land Acquisition References Due to Inordinate Delay and Laches. Petitioners failed to appear before the Reference Court for over a decade, leading to dismissal of references under Section 18 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The petitioners filed writ petitions challenging orders of the Civil Judge Senior Division, Omerga, dismissing their Land Acquisition References (LARs...