High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Reduced Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased motorcyclist found 50% contributory negligent for accident involving a lorry, reducing insurer's liability.

High Court: Karnataka High Court Bench: BENGALURU
  • 5
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The case arises from a motor accident that occurred on 26.12.2009 involving a motorcycle ridden by the deceased and a lorry owned by respondent no.5 and insured by the appellant insurance company. The deceased died in the accident. The claimants, being the legal representatives of the deceased, filed a claim petition before the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal (MACT), Mangalore, seeking compensation. The Tribunal, by judgment and award dated 23.6.2012 in MVC No.1259/2010, held the lorry driver solely negligent and awarded Rs.22,12,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. from the date of petition till realization. The insurance company appealed against the award (MFA No.8384/2012), contending that the deceased was contributory negligent as he was riding on the wrong side of the road. The claimants also appealed (MFA No.8039/2015) seeking enhancement of compensation. The High Court, after hearing both sides, examined the evidence including the spot sketch and the complaint. It found that the accident occurred on a straight road and the deceased motorcyclist was on the wrong side, which contributed to the accident. The Court held that both the lorry driver and the deceased were equally negligent, apportioning liability at 50% each. Consequently, the compensation awarded by the Tribunal was reduced by 50%. The Court also upheld the interest rate of 6% p.a. The appeals were disposed of accordingly, with the insurance company's appeal allowed in part and the claimants' appeal dismissed.

Headnote

A) Motor Vehicles Act - Contributory Negligence - Apportionment of Liability - Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The deceased motorcyclist was riding on the wrong side of the road and dashed against a lorry coming from the opposite direction. The Tribunal held the lorry driver solely negligent. The High Court, on appeal, found that the deceased was also negligent and apportioned liability equally at 50% each. (Paras 1-10)

B) Motor Vehicles Act - Compensation - Quantum - Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 - The Tribunal awarded Rs.22,12,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. The High Court, after considering the contributory negligence, reduced the compensation by 50% and also modified the interest rate to 6% p.a. as awarded. (Paras 1-10)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether the Tribunal erred in not attributing contributory negligence to the deceased motorcyclist and in awarding excessive compensation.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The High Court allowed the insurance company's appeal in part, holding the deceased 50% contributory negligent, and reduced the compensation by 50%. The claimants' appeal for enhancement was dismissed. The award was modified accordingly.

Law Points

  • Contributory negligence
  • Motor accident compensation
  • Apportionment of liability
  • Section 173(1) Motor Vehicles Act
  • 1988
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2017 LawText (KAR) (01) 12

Miscellaneous First Appeal No.8384 of 2012 connected with Miscellaneous First Appeal No.8039 of 2015

2017-01-03

Justice Anand Byrareddy, Justice B.A. Patil

Shri O. Mahesh (for appellant in MFA 8384/2012 and for respondent no.1 in MFA 8039/2015); Smt. Sandhya Rao P. (for respondents 1-4 in MFA 8384/2012 and for appellants in MFA 8039/2015)

Royal Sundaram Aliance Insurance Company Limited (in MFA 8384/2012); Mr. Dorairaj Pillay and others (in MFA 8039/2015)

Mr. Dorairaj Pillay and others (in MFA 8384/2012); Royal Sundaram Aliance Insurance Company Limited and another (in MFA 8039/2015)

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Appeals against judgment and award of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal in a claim for compensation for death in a motor vehicle accident.

Remedy Sought

Insurance company sought reduction of compensation on ground of contributory negligence; claimants sought enhancement of compensation.

Filing Reason

The insurance company challenged the Tribunal's finding of sole negligence on the lorry driver and the quantum of compensation; the claimants sought higher compensation.

Previous Decisions

The Tribunal (III Additional Senior Civil Judge, Member, MACT, Mangalore) by judgment and award dated 23.6.2012 in MVC No.1259/2010 awarded Rs.22,12,000/- with interest at 6% p.a. holding the lorry driver solely negligent.

Issues

Whether the deceased motorcyclist was contributory negligent? Whether the compensation awarded by the Tribunal is just and proper?

Submissions/Arguments

Insurance company argued that the deceased was riding on the wrong side of the road and dashed against the lorry, hence contributory negligent. Claimants argued that the lorry driver was solely negligent and the compensation was inadequate.

Ratio Decidendi

Where a motorcyclist rides on the wrong side of a straight road and collides with an oncoming vehicle, he is equally negligent with the other driver. Liability for compensation must be apportioned accordingly.

Judgment Excerpts

The deceased was riding the motorcycle on the wrong side of the road and dashed against the lorry coming from the opposite direction. Both the lorry driver and the deceased are equally negligent.

Procedural History

The claimants filed MVC No.1259/2010 before the MACT, Mangalore, which awarded compensation on 23.6.2012. The insurance company filed MFA No.8384/2012 and the claimants filed MFA No.8039/2015 before the High Court of Karnataka. Both appeals were heard together and disposed of on 3.1.2017.

Acts & Sections

  • Motor Vehicles Act, 1988: 173(1)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court High Court of Karnataka Allows Insurance Company's Appeal and Dismisses Claimants' Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Compensation Reduced Due to Contributory Negligence of Deceased. Deceased motorcyclist found 50% contributory negligent for accident...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Causing Death by Negligence Case Under Section 304A IPC. Concurrent findings of fact based on credible evidence of rash driving leading to death of a child not interfered with in revision.