Search Results for "arbitrary administrative action"

1891 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1891 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Passport Impounding Orders — Violation of Natural Justice. Impounding under Section 10(3)(e) of Passports Act, 1967 set aside as no show cause notice or hearing was given.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by individuals whose passports were impounded by the Passport Authority under Section 10(3)(e) of the P...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Transfer of NRI Assessee's Case Under Section 127 of Income Tax Act, 1961 Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Show-Cause Notice Not Served and Reply Not Considered Before Centralization of Case from Mumbai to Delhi.

The petitioner, Rajiv Saxena, a Non-Resident Indian living in Dubai since 1992, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Full Bench Interprets MEPS Act, 1977 and Rules, 1981 on Retired Awardee Teacher as Inquiry Committee Member. Conflict Between Division Bench Judgments on Whether Retired Teacher Can Be a Member Referred to Larger Bench for Authoritative Pronouncement.

The Full Bench of the Bombay High Court was constituted to resolve a conflict between two Division Bench judgments on the interpretation of Rule 36(2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation on Encroachments on Public Utility Land in Nagpur. Petition Treated as PIL and Notice Issued to Authorities for Removal of Encroachments on Reserved Lands.

The matter involves a public interest litigation filed before the High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Nagpur Bench, by social workers Madhukar Sampatr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Adjudicates Public Interest Litigation Seeking Removal of Encroachments on Public Utility Lands in Bezanbag Area; Petition Highlighted Apathy of Authorities in Removing Encroachments on Lands Reserved for Garden, Dispensary, and Educational Purposes.

The Writ Petition (PIL) No. 1515 of 2008, along with Contempt Petition No. 168 of 2014 and Writ Petition No. 123 of 2019, was filed in the High Court ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Seniority List in High Court Staff Service. Court upholds the principle that seniority is determined by the date of continuous officiation in a cadre, not by the date of initial appointment or confirmation.

The case involves four writ petitions filed by employees of the High Court of Bombay, Bench at Aurangabad, challenging the seniority list of Assistant...