NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 2486 OF 2005
30 Nov 2005The suit was filed by shareholders of Spice Jet Ltd, a domestic airline company formerly known as Modi Luft, which had undergone several ownership cha...
Search Results for "additional security deposit"
1217 result(s) found
Found 1217 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Co-operative Sugar Factory in Suit for Enforcement of Bank Guarantee, Holding Document Executed by Bank is a Contract of Guarantee under Section 126 of Indian Contract Act, 1872. Bank's Liability was Unconditional and Payable on Demand, Irrespective of Disputes Between Principal Parties, and Suit not Bad for Non-Joinder of Principal Debtor.
2 Aug 2005The dispute arose from a turnkey contract for erection of a paper plant between Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., a co-operative sugar factory, and ...
- 64
Supreme Court
Supreme Court hears appeals against High Court order setting aside DRAT decision and remitting bank recovery execution matter for fresh inquiry. The Court examines validity of auction sale of residential property, exemption under Section 60(1)(ccc) CPC, and procedural compliance under RDDB Act and Income Tax Act Rules in execution of compromise decree.
1 Jan 1970The appeals arose from a judgment of the High Court of Madhya Pradesh dated 15.05.2009 in Writ Petition No. 2199 of 2008, which set aside the order of...
- 10
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Examines Revocation of Letters of Administration Secured Through Fraud Under Indian Succession Act, 1925. Letters of Administration and Deed of Transfer Assailed for False Averments and Non-Service of Notice to Interested Parties Affecting Property Valued at Rs.150 Crores.
22 Sep 2025The dispute arose from the estate of Lady Jena Duggan, who died on 2 September 1993, leaving a Will dated 4 April 1993. Under that Will, the entire re...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Penalty for Excess Load Consumption as Unauthorised Use of Electricity Under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 — Assessment at Twice the Higher Tariff Applicable for the Category of Use, Not Consumer's Category. The court held that consumption in excess of connected load constitutes unauthorised use under Explanation (b)(iv) and assessment under Section 126(6) must be at twice the tariff for the category for which electricity was unauthorisedly used.
9 Dec 2022The case involves a batch of appeals by the Kerala State Electricity Board (KSEB) against a judgment of the Kerala High Court which held that for unau...
- 240
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeal Against High Court's Reversal of First Appellate Court's Decree for Specific Performance of Agreement for Sale. High Court Had Directed Refund of Earnest Money Instead of Specific Performance, Holding That Appellant Failed to Prove Readiness and Willingness.
1 Jan 1970The litigation arose from an agreement for sale dated 08.01.2010, whereby the defendants agreed to sell two items of immovable property to the appella...
- 64
High Court
- 17
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds High Court Decision on Public Parking Lot and FSI Computation in Mumbai Building Project. The Court held that construction of public parking lot above plinth level without valid commencement certificate was illegal, and remanded FSI computation issues for fresh consideration.
24 Oct 2019The case involves a dispute over the construction of a residential building and a public parking lot (PPL) by Shree Ram Urban Infrastructure Ltd. (SRU...
- 234
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Assault and Criminal Intimidation but Grants Probation to Accused. Court holds that benefit of Probation of Offenders Act can be granted even after conviction if no previous conviction is proved and circumstances warrant leniency.
25 Jun 2015The case arises from a private complaint filed by Sushil Sawant (appellant) against six accused persons (respondents 2 to 7) alleging offences under S...
- 200
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Developer's Interim Injunction Application in Redevelopment Dispute and Holds Civil Suit Not Barred by Section 91 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960. Developer's Claim for Specific Performance of Development Agreement Against Co-operative Housing Society Held Maintainable as Developer Is Not a Member Under Section 91, and Transaction Not Subject to Restrictions Under Sections 43, 44, or 45.
13 Jul 2016The suit was filed by a partnership firm of developers, Maya Developers, against the Azad Co-operative Housing Society Ltd. and its members, seeking s...
- 69
