Search Results for "Rule 137"

1194 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1194 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Bidder Qualification in Tender Process — Debarment by One State Does Not Automatically Disqualify in Another State's Tender Without Specific Clause in Tender Document.

The Petitioner, Smart Chip Pvt. Ltd., filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the decision of Respondent Nos....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Writ Petitions Challenging Reinstatement Orders for Daily-Wage Employees. Termination of daily-wage employees without compliance with Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 is illegal, and reinstatement with back wages is proper remedy.

The case involves four writ petitions arising from service disputes between the Maharashtra State Khadi and Village Industries Board (the employer) an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Refund Claim Under CGST Act Despite Previous Sanction for Overlapping Period. Second refund application for a specific month within a previously covered quarter is maintainable as the earlier sanction did not adjudicate the claim for that month.

The petitioner, Valmet Flow Control Pvt. Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 3 April...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 5563 OF 2022

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds SEBI Order Against Corporate Giant in Futures Manipulation Case. The Court held that cornering 93.63% open interest through agents and dumping shares to depress settlement price constituted fraud under PFUTP Regulations.

The case involves appeals by Reliance Industries Limited (RIL) against orders of the Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) which upheld SEBI's findings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Gujarat Allows Appeal in Contract Dispute — Remands Case for Fresh Consideration of Counterclaim Due to Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Opportunity to Lead Evidence on Counterclaim Under Order 8 Rule 6A CPC Warrants Remand.

The appellant, Executive Engineer of Gujarat Water Supply and Sewerage Board, filed a suit for damages of Rs. 17,28,855.65 against the respondent, Kat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Valuation Case — Confirms CESTAT's Finding That Transaction Value of Imported Goods Is Acceptable Under Section 14 of Customs Act, 1962. Burden of Proof on Revenue to Show Fraud or Misdeclaration Not Discharged.

The case involves four Civil Miscellaneous Appeals filed by the Commissioner of Customs (Port-Export), Chennai, under Section 130 of the Customs Act, ...