Search Results for "Extraordinary Writ Jurisdiction"

1930 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1930 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 6608 OF 2016

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging DRT Recovery Officer's Confirmation of Private Sale. Court Holds That Once Sale Is Confirmed and Possession Delivered, Remedy Lies in Civil Suit for Damages, Not in Writ Jurisdiction Under Articles 226 and 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioners, Shaikh Gulab Shaikh Ahmed and Ambadas Maruti Kale, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India chal...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 3310 OF 2017

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Anganwadi Sevika with Full Back Wages in Termination Dispute. Industrial Court's Revision Order Restoring Continuity and Back Wages Upheld as Termination Found Unjustified Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The petitioners, the Zilla Parishad and the Child Development Project Officer, challenged the judgment of the Industrial Court dated 17/09/2013 in Rev...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Appeal and Petition Challenging KIADB Land Allotment — No Pre-existing Right of Appellant Established. Allotment to Third Party Upheld as Valid Under KIAD Act, 1966.

The appellant, Garden City Fashions Pvt Ltd, filed a writ appeal and a writ petition challenging the allotment of land by the Karnataka Industrial Are...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Waiver of Pre-deposit Under Section 129E of Customs Act, 1962. Mandatory Pre-deposit Cannot Be Waived Under Article 226 in Light of Supreme Court Precedent in Kotak Mahindra Bank.

The petitioners, Lalit Kulthia and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court seeking ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging CAT Order Allowing Change of Date of Birth of IAS Officer. Authorities' Delay in Deciding Application for Correction of Date of Birth Cannot Be Used to Defeat Claim Under Rule 38 of Maharashtra Civil Services (General Conditions of Service) Rules, 1981.

The Union of India and the State of Maharashtra filed two writ petitions challenging the judgment and order dated 8 March 2016 passed by the Central A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 107119 OF 2025 (APMC)

...