Search Results for "Deemed Withdrawal"

1085 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1085 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Objections to Nomination in Cooperative Society Election. Removal from Managing Committee Under Section 78(1)(b) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Disqualifies Candidates from Contesting Election to Board of Directors.

The petitioners, Irshad Abdul Sattar Deshmukh and Rama Seva Chavan, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC's Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reinstatement Order in Forgery Case. Industrial Court's Power to Grant Reinstatement Without Remand Under Section 44 MRTU & PULP Act Upheld as Enquiry Findings Were Perverse.

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC), challenged the order of the Industrial Court which, in revision under Section 44...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration — Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Valid as Stay Did Not Cover Acquisition Proceedings

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, owned property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanjur, Mumbai. The property was de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Slum Land Acquisition Despite Interim Stay on Declaration. Acquisition Under Section 14 of Maharashtra Slum Areas Act Held Independent of Declaration Under Section 4, Not Barred by Interim Order.

The petitioners, Murlidhar Teckchand Gandhi and others, challenged the acquisition of their property bearing CTS No. 165, 165/1 to 51 at Village Kanju...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Market Fee on Copra as Not Notified Agricultural Produce Under APMC Act. Explanation to Rule 32(1) of Goa APMC Rules Held Ultra Vires as Copra Not in Schedule to Maharashtra Agricultural Produce Marketing (Regulation) Act, 1963.

The petitioners, Marico Industries Ltd. and Jude Linhares, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging the demand for market...