Search Results for "Bombay High Court jurisdiction"

22013 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 22013 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Claim of Automatic Lapsing of Land Reservation Under Section 49(7) of the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966. Petitioners Argued That Failure to Acquire Land Within Prescribed Period After Purchase Notice Entitled Them to Release From Reservation.

The petitions arose from the reservation of land in Andheri, Mumbai, for a public garden under successive development plans. The petitioner, Mehtab La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Hears Appeals in Gang Rape Case; Convicts Challenge Conviction and State Seeks Enhancement of Sentence. Accused Were Convicted Under Sections 376(2)(g) and 366 IPC for Gang Rape of Two Minor Girls and Sentenced to 10 Years Rigorous Imprisonment.

Criminal appeals arising from the judgment of the Sessions Court, Parbhani, in Sessions Case No. 121 of 1994 were taken up by the High Court of Judica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Whether Temporary Injunction to Restrain Alienation Pending Suit is Necessary Despite Section 52 of Transfer of Property Act, 1882. The Court Revisits Its Earlier Decision in Sharad Mor's Case in the Context of Multiple Appeals from Orders Refusing Injunctions.

These appeals raised a common question about the necessity of granting a temporary injunction to restrain a defendant from creating third party intere...