Trending :
Lawtext
Search
Login / Register
Sign In
HomeJudgement
Scroll Down To Discover
High Court

Bombay High Court Adjudicates Writ Petition Against Order Refusing Rejection of Plaint in Commercial Suit. The petition challenges the Commercial Court's dismissal of an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, for rejection of the plaint in a commercial dispute involving foreign entities.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: BOMBAY
Admin
2026-09-07 14:59:06
  • 87
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Issue of Consideration

WRIT PETITION NO. 9148 OF 2023

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Case Details

2025 LawText (BOM) (04) 134

Writ Petition No. 9148 of 2023

2025-04-17

N. J. Jamadar

2025:BHC-AS:17542

Mr. Vijay Parikh, with Dharmesh S. Jain, i/b Anil T. Agarwal, for the Petitioner; Mr. Kunal Vaishnav, with Rahul Kothari & Surbhi Soni, i/b MGV & Associates, for Respondent No.1

A Schulman Inc Ltd and John Steele

Odyssey Tours And Travels, Basell Polyolefins India Private Limited, Randeep Ranadev, Nirali More

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Civil writ petition under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Commercial Court dismissing an application for rejection of plaint.

Remedy Sought

The Petitioners sought quashing of the order dated 4 May 2022 and dismissal of the suit/rejection of the plaint.

Filing Reason

The Petitioners' application (Exhibit 53) for dismissal of the suit or rejection of the plaint was dismissed by the Commercial Court.

Previous Decisions

The Commercial Court at Pune, by order dated 4 May 2022 in Special Commercial Civil Suit No. 211 of 2016, dismissed the Petitioners' application (Exhibit 53).

Judgment Excerpts

The Petitioners-Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 take exception to an Order dated 4th May 2022 passed by the Commercial Court at Pune in Special Commercial Civil Suit No. 211 of 2016, whereby an application preferred by the Petitioners for dismissal of the Suit/rejection of the Plaint (Exhibit '53') preferred by the Petitioners came to be dismissed.

Procedural History

The Petitioners filed an application (Exhibit 53) in Special Commercial Civil Suit No. 211 of 2016 before the Commercial Court, Pune, seeking dismissal of the suit or rejection of the plaint. By order dated 4 May 2022, the Commercial Court dismissed the application. The Petitioners then preferred the present writ petition challenging that order.

Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Tags :
Writ Petition Commercial Suit Rejection of Plaint Order VII Rule 11 Commercial Court

Pay once for this file or subscribe for unlimited downloads

Related Judgement
High Court Madras High Court Directs Removal of Encroachments on Public Road in Panchayat Land — Orders Demolition of Security Room and Wall to Restore Public Access. The court held that revenue officials must ensure removal of all illegal structures on publi... 2026-09-13 16:10:16
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Refusal to Refer Dispute Under Section 64 of Land Acquisition Act. Competent Authority Directed to Refer Dispute Regarding Apportionment of Compensation to Arbitrator Under Section 51 of the Right to... 2026-09-13 16:10:00
Categories
Popular Tags
writ petition Natural Justice acquittal murder compensation burden of proof limitation Article 226 benefit of doubt land acquisition
Follow Us

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensation Cases,...

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Dispute — Upho...

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Suit for Spec...

Bombay High Court Dismisses MBBS Student's Writ Petition Seeking Fourth Attempt in Anatomy...

High Court of Bombay Hears Writ Petitions Challenging Tenancy Orders Under Bombay Tenancy ...

Supreme Court Acquits Appellant in Prevention of Corruption Act Case Due to Absence of Pec...

Supreme Court Modifies High Court Order Appointing Different Arbitrator Under Section 11 o...

Supreme Court Upholds Scrutiny Committee Invalidation of Scheduled Tribe Caste Claim but P...

Supreme Court Allows Homebuyers' Appeal and Waives Time Extension Charges Imposed by Devel...

Supreme Court Dismisses Insurer's and Claimant's Appeals in Motor Accident Death Compensat...

Lost Your Password?