High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Appeals Filed Against Single Judge Order in Land Acquisition Matters Involving KIADB. Appeals Challenge Order Dated 04.07.2025 in Various Writ Petitions Filed by Landowners and Developers.
29 Jul 2026...
Search Results for "registered settlement deed"
1025 result(s) found
Found 1025 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Specific Performance Suit — Cause of Action Disclosed. Court holds that a plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC if it discloses a cause of action, even if the claim may ultimately fail on merits.
19 Jun 2019The judgment pertains to a Notice of Motion filed by defendant No.1 in a suit for specific performance. The defendant sought rejection of the plaint u...
- 59
High Court
High Court Directs Police to Register FIR in Partnership Dispute Case Under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 - Writ Petition Allowed
30 Jan 2026The petitioner, filed a writ petition seeking direction to the police to register an FIR based on his complaint dated 29.09.2025 alleging various offe...
- 702
High Court
KAHC010525052012_1
23 Aug 2021The litigation originated from a suit for partition and declaration filed by the plaintiff, D. Sujatha, against the legal representatives of the origi...
- 12
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes SDM Order in Mosque Management Dispute — Lack of Urgency and Improper Exercise of Powers Under Section 144 CrPC. Dispute over management of mosque built on Chalta No.201 under P.T. Sheet No.155; court held that SDM cannot use preventive powers to settle civil disputes or appoint a committee without imminent danger.
2 Aug 2006The petitioners, six individuals, filed a criminal writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging an order dated 6 October 2005 passed b...
- 115
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes SDM Order in Mosque Management Dispute — Holds That Dispute Over Religious Trust Management Is Not a 'Land Dispute' Under Section 145 CrPC. The court ruled that proceedings under Section 145 CrPC are not maintainable when the dispute pertains to management of a religious institution rather than actual possession of land.
2 Aug 2006The petitioners, six individuals, filed a Criminal Writ Petition before the Bombay High Court at Goa challenging an order dated 6 October 2005 passed ...
- 155
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Provisional Attachment Order in PMLA Case for Lack of Scheduled Offence. Attachment of properties under Section 5(1) of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 set aside as predicate offence was not a scheduled offence under PMLA.
23 Aug 2021The petitioners, Sunlight Housing Development Pvt. Ltd., Mukesh Doshi, Kaushal Doshi, and Mack Star Marketing Pvt. Ltd., filed writ petitions challeng...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Travel Permission for Accused in POCSO Case — Accused Allowed to Travel to US for Ten Months with Cash Security. Special Court's Order Relaxing Bail Conditions Upheld as No Perversity Found; Accused Must Return by 30.06.2020 and Attend Police Station Upon Return.
11 Sep 2019The petitioner, Maria Kuttubudin Lokhandwala, filed a criminal writ petition challenging an order dated 22.08.2019 passed by the learned Special Judge...
- 90
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Public Trust in Tenancy Exemption Case — Trust Income Utilized for Trust Purposes Exempts from Fixation of Price Under Sections 46 and 54 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 by Virtue of Section 129(b). The court held that a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 is entitled to exemption from tenancy provisions if the income from the land is used for trust purposes, regardless of the date of registration.
24 Apr 2014The petitioner, Shri Nathaji Mandir Sanstha (Shri Krishnalalaji Mandir Trust), is a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 o...
- 141
High Court
High Court of Bombay Considers Appeals Against Company Law Board Order Directing Buyout of Majority Stake in Wind Energy Company. The majority shareholder challenged the finding of oppression and the forced sale of shares to minority shareholders under sections 397, 402 and 403 of the Companies Act, 1956.
20 Aug 2015The proceedings arose from disputes between the shareholders of Enercon (India) Limited, now known as Wind World (India) Limited, a company engaged in...
- 46
