Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Public Trust in Tenancy Exemption Case — Trust Income Utilized for Trust Purposes Exempts from Fixation of Price Under Sections 46 and 54 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 by Virtue of Section 129(b). The court held that a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 is entitled to exemption from tenancy provisions if the income from the land is used for trust purposes, regardless of the date of registration.

High Court: Bombay High Court Bench: NAGPUR In Favour of Accused
  • 117
Judgement Image
Font size:
Print

Case Note & Summary

The petitioner, Shri Nathaji Mandir Sanstha (Shri Krishnalalaji Mandir Trust), is a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 on 15th March 1972. It owned agricultural land that was tenanted. The tenant, Vishnu s/o Kisan Pakade, initiated proceedings under Section 46 read with Section 54 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 for fixation of purchase price of the land. The trust defended the proceedings on the ground that the income from the land was utilized for the purposes of the trust, and therefore, by virtue of Section 129(b) of the Tenancy Act, the provisions of Sections 46 and 54 were not applicable. The Tahsildar accepted this claim and held that the trust was exempt. However, the Sub-Divisional Officer set aside the Tahsildar's order, and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal upheld the SDO's order. The trust then filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging both orders. The key legal issue was whether a public trust registered under the BPT Act is entitled to exemption under Section 129(b) of the Tenancy Act. The court noted that the concurrent finding of fact that the income from the property was being utilized for trust purposes was not disputed. The court relied on two earlier decisions of the same court: in the case of Shri Gopal Laxman Mahajan v. Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal and another, and in the case of Shri Gajanan Maharaj Sansthan v. Shri Ramchandra and others, which held that the exemption under Section 129(b) applies to all trusts registered under the BPT Act, irrespective of the date of registration. The court allowed the petition, set aside the orders of the SDO and the Tribunal, and restored the order of the Tahsildar, thereby exempting the trust from the tenancy provisions.

Headnote

A) Tenancy Law - Exemption for Public Trusts - Section 129(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 - The petitioner, a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950, claimed exemption from fixation of price under Sections 46 and 54 of the Tenancy Act on the ground that income from the land was used for trust purposes. The concurrent finding of fact that income was so utilized was not challenged. The court held that the trust is entitled to exemption under Section 129(b) irrespective of the date of registration, relying on precedents that the exemption applies to all trusts registered under the BPT Act. (Paras 1-5)

Subscribe to unlock Headnote Subscribe Now

Issue of Consideration

Whether a public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 is entitled to exemption from the provisions of Sections 46 and 54 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 under Section 129(b) thereof, when the income from the tenanted land is utilized for the purposes of the trust.

Subscribe to unlock Issue of Consideration Subscribe Now

Final Decision

The petition is allowed. The orders passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer and the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal are quashed and set aside. The order passed by the Tahsildar is restored. Rule is made absolute accordingly. No order as to costs.

Law Points

  • Exemption under Section 129(b) of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act
  • 1958 applies to public trusts registered under Bombay Public Trusts Act
  • 1950 if income from tenanted land is utilized for trust purposes
  • regardless of date of registration
  • concurrent finding of fact that income is used for trust purposes is binding and not challenged.
Subscribe to unlock Law Points Subscribe Now

Case Details

2014 LawText (BOM) (04) 137

Writ Petition No.1207 of 2000

2014-04-24

R.K. Deshpande, J.

Shri A.J. Gilda for Petitioners, Shri R.R. Deshpande for Respondent No.1

Shri Nathaji Mandir Sanstha (Shri Krishnalalaji Mandir Trust) through its Trustees

Vishnu s/o Kisan Pakade, Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal, Nagpur

Subscribe to unlock Case Details (Citation, Judge, Date & more) Subscribe Now

Nature of Litigation

Writ petition challenging orders of Sub-Divisional Officer and Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in tenancy proceedings for fixation of price.

Remedy Sought

Petitioner sought quashing of orders of SDO and MRT and restoration of Tahsildar's order exempting trust from tenancy provisions.

Filing Reason

The trust claimed exemption under Section 129(b) of the Tenancy Act as income from land was used for trust purposes, but lower authorities rejected the claim.

Previous Decisions

Tahsildar allowed exemption; SDO set aside Tahsildar's order; MRT upheld SDO's order.

Issues

Whether the trust is entitled to exemption under Section 129(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958. Whether the date of registration of the trust under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 affects the applicability of the exemption.

Submissions/Arguments

Petitioner argued that income from land is used for trust purposes and hence exemption under Section 129(b) applies. Respondent did not challenge the finding that income is used for trust purposes.

Ratio Decidendi

A public trust registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 is entitled to exemption from the provisions of Sections 46 and 54 of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958 under Section 129(b) thereof, provided the income from the tenanted land is utilized for the purposes of the trust. The exemption applies irrespective of the date of registration of the trust.

Judgment Excerpts

It is not disputed by the learned counsels appearing for the parties that the Authorities below have concurrently held that the income from the property is being utilized for the purposes of the Trust. The issue involved in this petition is squarely covered by the two decisions of this Court.

Procedural History

The Tahsildar initially allowed the trust's claim for exemption. The Sub-Divisional Officer set aside that order on appeal. The Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal upheld the SDO's order. The trust then filed the present writ petition in the Bombay High Court.

Acts & Sections

  • Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950:
  • Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958: 46, 54, 129(b)
Subscribe to unlock full Legal Analysis Subscribe Now
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Public Trust in Tenancy Exemption Case — Trust Income Utilized for Trust Purposes Exempts from Fixation of Price Under Sections 46 and 54 of Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands (Vidarbha Region) Act, 1958...
Related Judgement
High Court Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Culpable Homicide Case Due to Lack of Intent and Sudden Provocation. Conviction under Section 304 Part II IPC set aside as the act was not intentional but occurred during a sudden quarrel.