Search Results for "quality evidence"

2277 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2277 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Supplier Against Western Coalfields Limited for Withholding Admitted Dues. Withholding of Payment Based on Vigilance Report Without Hearing Violates Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Sujyoti India (P) Limited, a private limited company and authorized distributor of SKF India Limited, entered into a rate contract wit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Seed Company Officials in Seeds Act Violation Case. Court holds that vicarious liability cannot be imposed on officers without specific averments of their role in the alleged offence under Section 6(b) read with Section 7 of the Seeds Act, 1966.

The petitioners, M/s Mahyco Vegetable Seeds Ltd. (a seed producer), its Deputy Manager (Legal) M.M. Chavan, and Senior Manager (SDM) Anil Kolte, chall...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Revenue's Assessment Under Section 44D of Income-tax Act Despite Income Not Being Taxable at Time of Asset Transfer. Partners of Firm That Transferred Assets to Non-Resident Corporation Assessable on Corporation's Income as They Acquired Right to Enjoy Income by Means of Transfer.

The case arose from a dispute under the Indian Income-tax Act, 1922 concerning the assessment of partners of a firm that had transferred assets to a n...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Revenue's Appeals Against ITAT Decision Favoring Assessee on Deduction of Distributable Surplus Payment to Brand Owner. Court Examines Whether Payment is Allowable Under Section 37 of Income Tax Act, 1961 or Constitutes Application of Income or Diversion by Overriding Title.

The present set of five tax appeals arises under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, filed by the Revenue against the common order of the Incom...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Upholds Arbitral Award in Favor of Oil Corporation in Kerosene Supply Contract Dispute. Arbitrator Had Rejected Limitation Defense Under Contractual Clause and Held Clause Not Void Under Section 28 of Indian Contract Act.

The matter arose from an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by the original respondent in the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO.2457 OF 2012

The Bombay High Court was seized with four writ petitions filed by various trade unions representing aircraft engineers, technical staff, and technici...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.238 OF 2019

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Li...