FIRST APPEAL NO.78 OF 2016
19 Aug 2022The matter was a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the judgment and award dated 22.03.2016 passed by the District Court,...
Search Results for "land use regulation"
1361 result(s) found
Found 1361 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Quash Order Refusing FIR Registration in Environmental Violation Case — Section 19 of Environment (Protection) Act, 1986 Bars Private Complaints Without Government Sanction. The court held that Section 19 does not bar police from registering an FIR, but the applicant's complaint lacked specific allegations of violation of the Act or rules.
22 Oct 2019The applicant, Pratap Lal Teli, filed a Criminal Application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking to quash an order pass...
- 129
High Court
Bombay High Court Stays Tender Process for DPD Transport Solution — Transporters' Association and Importer Challenge Monopolistic Selection. Interim Order Prevents JNPT from Proceeding with Tender for Selection of Five Transporters, Protecting Existing Rights Pending Final Hearing.
4 Aug 2017The dispute arose from a tender notice dated 23 March 2017 issued by the Jawaharlal Nehru Port Trust (Respondent No. 2) for selection of transporters ...
- 50
High Court
Trustees’ Authority in Managing Encroached Land for Slum Rehabilitation: Bombay High Court Clarifies. Bombay High Court allows PLAINTIFFS to collaborate with developers to undertake slum rehabilitation on its encroached lands, empowering trustees under the Public Trust Act.
9 Oct 20241. Introduction:The plaintiffs, A. H. Wadia Trust, a public charitable trust, along with its trustees (Plaintiffs No. 2 to 5), approached the court vi...
- 2040
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Civil Reference in Suit for Injunction Against Recovery of Non-Agricultural Charges Under Bombay Revenue Jurisdiction Act, 1876. Civil Court Not Barred from Entertaining Suit as It Does Not Challenge Assessment but Merely Restrains Recovery of Charges.
6 Oct 2006The case involves a civil reference made by the Civil Judge, Senior Division, Latur to the Bombay High Court under Section 13 of the Bombay Revenue Ju...
- 88
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Regularisation of Irregular Allotment of Land for Commercial Complex in Navi Mumbai, Imposing Restitution of Rs. 100 Crore. The Court held that where irreversible economic and social consequences have crystallised over two decades, public interest may be better served by regularisation with full financial restitution rather than demolition.
1 Jan 2026The case pertains to a challenge against the allotment of land by CIDCO to K. Raheja Corp. Private Limited (the Developer) for the construction of a s...
- 159
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Succession Act Case — Order Granting Succession Certificate Set Aside for Lack of Notice to All Heirs. Failure to Issue Notice to Appellant Under Section 384 of Indian Succession Act, 1925 Violates Principles of Natural Justice.
1 Feb 2024The appellant, T. Nagendra Setty, filed an appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, challenging the order dated 30.08.2023 passed ...
- 105
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demand Notice for Royalty on Steatite Extraction in Violation of Affidavit Condition — Petitioner's Use of Mineral for Decorative Blocks Not Proved to Be for Cottage Industry. Affidavit Undertaking Not Incorporated in Lease Deed Cannot Be Enforced as Condition of Lease.
14 Aug 2014The petitioner, S.K. Suresh, held a quarry lease for steatite (a minor mineral) granted on 10-11-2010 under the Karnataka Minor Mineral Concession Rul...
- 67
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Petition in Customs Case — Redemption Fine and Penalty Reduced for Import of Used Personal Effects. Gold chain with diamond pendant held to be 'personal effects' under Baggage Rules, 1998, entitling duty-free import.
5 Jul 2024The petitioner, a US citizen of Indian origin, arrived in Mumbai on 6th May 2007 from New York. He was wearing a gold chain with a pendant embedded wi...
- 631
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Application Seeking to Treat Oral Dictation as Final Order — Signed Order Prevails Over Dictation in Open Court. The Court held that the signed order uploaded on 12.02.2026 is the binding order, not the oral dictation, and the Judge has the right to change the order until it is signed under Order XII of the Supreme Court Rules.
12 May 2026The Supreme Court dismissed a miscellaneous application filed by respondents in a disposed civil appeal, seeking clarification that the order dictated...
- 393
