Search Results for "illegal transfer"

3228 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3228 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlady's Suit for Possession in Rent Control Case — Limitation Governed by Article 67 of Limitation Act, 1963. Suit Filed Within 12 Years from Termination of Tenancy by Notice is Maintainable.

The case involves a dispute between a landlady (since deceased, represented by heirs) and a tenant (since deceased, represented by heirs) regarding po...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Special Civil Application Quashing Revenue Orders on Section 73AA Noting -- Bombay Land Revenue Code Not Retrospectively Applicable to Pre-1979 Land Transaction -- Mutation Entry Confirmed Without Section 73AA Remarks

The petitioner purchased land in 1967 through registered sale deed and obtained mutation entry in 1977 -- Despite civil court decrees establishing his...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Missing Female Baby — No Illegal Detention Established. Court holds that habeas corpus is not maintainable when the alleged detenu is not in custody of respondents and the petitioner fails to prove illegal detention.

The petitioner, Smt. Shankramma Poojari, a fruit vendor, filed a habeas corpus petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Demolition Order Against Partnership Firm in BBMP Property Dispute — Lack of Proper Notice and Violation of Natural Justice. Demolition of Building Without Giving Opportunity of Hearing Held Illegal Under Karnataka Municipal Corporations Act, 1976.

The petitioners, M/s. Raghava Reddy and Associates, a partnership firm, along with its partners, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition Involving Parking Amenity Dispute Under Article 226. Court Finds That Alteration of Parking Amenity Raises Public Law Concerns Requiring Planning Authority to Regard Public Convenience and Safety.

The Bombay High Court adjudicated a writ petition filed by Unity Mall Premises Co-operative Society against Vasai-Virar City Municipal Corporation and...