Search Results for "exhaustive provisions"

1811 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1811 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Order Denying Supplementary Gratuity to Disabled Employee under M.S.R.T.C. Regulations. Non-Compliance with Section 47 of Persons with Disabilities Act Deemed Employer's Default, Entitling Employee to Supplementary Gratuity under Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

The writ petition challenged the orders of the Additional Labour Commissioner and Appellate Authority under the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972, which r...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Central Excise Notification on Tobacco Products. Challenge to Notification No.3/2019 under Central Excise Act, 1944 Alleged Violation of Constitutional and Statutory Provisions.

A batch of writ petitions was filed by several manufacturers of tobacco and tobacco products under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes NCLT Order Directing State to Permit Windmill Operations in Insolvency Case. NCLT Exceeded Jurisdiction by Exercising Judicial Review Over Administrative Decision, Following Supreme Court Decision in Embassy Property Developments v. State of Karnataka.

The dispute arose out of insolvency proceedings against M/s Wind World (India) Limited, which held a lease over forest land for operating windmills. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Considers Quashing of FIR Alleging Extortion Racket in Electoral Bond Scheme. Former BJP State President Challenges Registration of Crime Under Sections 384, 120B, 34 IPC Based on Private Complaint.

The petitioner, a former Member of Parliament and State President of BJP, filed a petition under Section 482 CrPC seeking to quash FIR No. 224/2024 re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Dismisses Second Appeal in Motor Vehicle Tax Recovery Suit Holding Civil Court Jurisdiction Impliedly Barred. Suit Against State Authorities Barred by Order 9 Rule 9 CPC and Alternate Remedy Under Bombay Motor Vehicle Taxes Act, 1958 Precludes Civil Suit.

The second appeal arose from a suit filed by M/s Pandurang & Krishnarao Co., the owner of a truck, which was sold to defendant no.4 and subsequently t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Dealer's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Dealer Not Liable as Owner Under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988. Dealership Agreement Cannot Shift Statutory Liability of Manufacturer for Third-Party Compensation.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Vaibhav Jain, the proprietor of M/s Vaibhav Motors, a dealer of Hindustan Motors Pvt. Ltd. The case aros...