Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

2036 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2036 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Franchise Dispute: Breach of Contract Not Cheating Without Fraudulent Intent. Essential Ingredients of Sections 420 and 406 IPC Not Made Out as Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature.

The applicants, directors of AN Retail Ventures Private Limited (ANR), sought quashing of FIR No.134/2021 registered at Osmanpura Police Station, Aura...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Commercial Dispute Over Soyabean Supply — No Cheating Intent Established. Contractual Breach Without Deceitful Intention from Inception Does Not Attract Section 420 IPC.

The applicants, a partnership firm named Sagacious Impex, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 seeking quashing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Landmark Judgment on Property Rights and Public Welfare in Mumbai" "Balancing property ownership with the collective good under India's constitutional framework."

The Supreme Court examined whether Chapter VIII-A of the MHADA Act aligns with the principles of Article 39(b) of the Indian Constitution, which aims ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Injunction Case — Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Injunction Applications Without Considering Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. Order 39 Rule 1 and 2 CPC — Court Held That Plaintiff's Possession and Title Must Be Protected Pending Suit.

The appellant, Smt. Jagadishwari, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Order 43 Rule 1(r) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) against the o...