Search Results for "special land acquisition officer"

2072 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2072 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Acquiring Body's Writ Petition Challenging Section 28-A Award as Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy. Acquiring Body Cannot Seek Reference Under Section 28-A(3) of Land Acquisition Act, 1894, as It Is Not a 'Person Interested' and Is Barred by Section 50(2).

The Bombay High Court dealt with three writ petitions filed by the Maharashtra Krishna Valley Development Corporation Limited, the acquiring body for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Property Tax Reassessment Under Maharashtra Municipal Councils, Nagar Panchayats and Industrial Townships Act, 1965 — Held That Notice Under Section 116(2) Is Not a Condition Precedent for Reassessment Under Section 116(1).

The petitioners, owners of a property in Baramati, challenged the reassessment of property tax by the Baramati Nagar Parishad. The property was origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Allows Appeal in Land Acquisition Case — Compensation Reduced for Paddy Fields Acquired for Konkan Railway. Reference Court's reliance on prior award for garden land held erroneous as acquired land was paddy field with different valuation.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Special Land Acquisition Officer (South Goa) and the Chief Engineer, Konkan Railway Corporation Ltd. again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals for Enhanced Compensation in Land Acquisition Case for Irrigation Scheme. Market value determined at Rs.308.25 per sq. mtr. with 10% escalation for delay in notification under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The present appeals were filed by the claimants challenging the judgment and award dated 03.09.2021 passed by the learned Reference Court in LAR No.24...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Declaration for Power Station Due to Delay Beyond One Year. Section 6 Declaration Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Quashed as Issued After Expiry of Statutory Period from Section 4 Notification.

The petitioner, Madanlal Lalchand Jain, challenged the legality and validity of a declaration under section 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Appeals in Land Acquisition Case — Enhances Compensation for Narmada Project. The court held that the reference court's valuation was inadequate and enhanced the market value based on the land's potential and purpose of acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The case involves multiple first appeals filed by the claimants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 19.08.2017 and 28.08.2017 passed by...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 73 OF 2015

...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Government Resolution Prescribing Fees for Permission to Mortgage Occupancy Class II Lands. Condition Imposing Payment of Fees Held Valid Under Section 43 of Maharashtra Land Revenue Code, 1966 and Not Violative of Article 14 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, BILT Graphic Paper Products Limited, a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in paper manufacturing, challenged ...