Search Results for "share control"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Incredible Dying Declaration...
Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Under Section 182 IPC for Lack of Val...

Search Results for "share control"

1615 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1615 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

11 Mar 2020

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition in Eviction Suit Based on Acquisition of Suitable Residence. Purchase of Plot in Wife's Name and Construction of House Does Not Conclude Acquisition of Suitable Residence Under Section 13(1)(l) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

12 Jan 2010

The case involves a dispute between the legal representatives of the original defendant-tenant (petitioners) and the legal representatives of the orig...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Eviction Decree — Court Receiver Need Not Seek Separate Leave to Sue When Appointed with Full Powers Under Order 40 Rule 1(d) CPC. Notice Under Section 106 T.P. Act Demanding Immediate Possession Is Not Invalid If Suit Filed After Notice Period.

16 Sep 2010

The plaintiff, the Court Receiver appointed by the High Court in Suit No.234 of 1987, was the receiver of the suit property 'Dev Ashish' at Peddar Roa...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in CENVAT Credit Case for Outdoor Catering Services. Outdoor Catering Service Provided to Factory Employees Held as Input Service Under Rule 2(l) of Cenvat Credit Rules, 2004 Due to Statutory Obligation Under Factories Act, 1948.

25 Oct 2010

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Nagpur, appealed against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) which allowe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Against Eviction Decree in Partnership Property Dispute. Concurrent findings of fact that defendants were licensees, not tenants, upheld under Article 227.

12 Aug 2011

The petitioners (original defendants) were a partnership firm occupying premises owned by the respondent (original plaintiff) partnership firm. Initia...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case Regarding Transaction Charges. Transaction charges paid to stock exchanges are not fees for technical services under Section 194J of the Income Tax Act, 1961, as stock exchanges perform regulatory and administrative functions.

21 Oct 2011

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) regarding the assessment y...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Executrix's Suit for Copyright Infringement of Song from Film 'Talash' — Plaintiff Failed to Establish Ownership of Copyright in Cinematographic Film Under Copyright Act, 1957. The court held that the plaintiff, claiming as executrix of the deceased producer, did not prove that the copyright in the song vested in the estate, as the song was composed by a third party and the producer had only commissioned the film.

8 May 2012

The plaintiff, Rupalli P. Shah, claiming to be the executrix of the last Will and testament of O.P. Ralhan (deceased), filed a suit seeking to restrai...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Electricity Tower Construction on Agricultural Land Without Consent. Landowners' Rights Under Article 300A of the Constitution Upheld Against State's Unilateral Action.

4 Sep 2012

The petitioners, Kishor s/o Ravindra Zope, Pradip s/o Ravindra Zope, and Pushpabai (Punyabai) w/o Ravindra Zope, are agriculturists residing in Warang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landowner's Compensation Claim Under Indian Telegraph Act for Tree Removal by Electricity Board - Maintainability of Application Under Section 16(3) Upheld. The court held that Section 16(3) of the Indian Telegraph Act, 1885 applies to electricity boards for compensation for tree removal, and the District Judge has jurisdiction to decide such application.

8 Dec 2005

The case involves two writ petitions. The first writ petition was filed by Sau. Kalpana Rukhabdas Jain, a landowner, challenging the order dated 25.1....

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Doubtful Circumstantial Links. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove motive and chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

8 Jun 2005

The appellant, Chandrasen Maruti Dhotre, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Sangli in Sessions Case No. 111 of 1999 for the murder of his brother-in...

93 94 95 96 97

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)