Search Results for "revision under Article 227"

1376 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1376 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Considers Writ Petitions Challenging Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal's Orders in Tenancy Dispute. The Court Examines Whether Tenant's Default in Rent Payment for Three Years Warrants Eviction Under Section 25(2) of Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The dispute concerned agricultural lands bearing Survey Nos. 24/2A and 24/2B, originally leased by the landlord’s predecessor to the tenant’s pred...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Landlord's Challenge to MRT Order Granting Tenant Declaration Under Bombay Tenancy Act. Dispute Involves Agricultural Land Where MRT Overturned Concurrent Findings, Applying Deemed Tenancy Under Section 4 and Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The matter arose from a tenancy application filed by the respondent under Section 70(b) of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, seekin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Housing Society's Petition Challenging Membership Admission Under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 -- Court Upholds Revisional Authority's Order Directing Admission of Respondent as Society Member

The petitioner housing society challenged orders under Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 directing admission of respondent no. 1 as member ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Reinstatement of Workman in Absenteeism and Assault Case, Reduces Backwages to 25%. Industrial Court's reduction of backwages from 50% to 25% upheld as workman failed to prove he was not gainfully employed during dismissal period.

The petitioner, Sahebrao Khemaji Kale, a workman employed as a Painter and later Moulder with Paras Agro Engineering Work, was dismissed from service ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Challenging Rejection of Temporary Injunction in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Held That Order of Rejection Is Not Appealable Under Order XLIII Rule 1(r) CPC as It Does Not Amount to Refusal of Injunction Under Order XXXIX Rule 1 or 2 CPC.

The petitioners filed two writ petitions challenging the order of the Senior Civil Judge, Jamkhandi, dated 18.01.2018, rejecting their application for...